๐Ÿ“Š

Understanding Oligopoly and Kinked Demand

Apr 25, 2025

Oligopoly and the Kinked Demand Curve Model

Overview

  • Focus: Detailed look at oligopoly using the Kinked Demand Curve Model.
  • Structure:
    • Characteristics of oligopoly.
    • Kinked Demand Curve diagram.
    • Conclusions from the model.
  • Next topic: Using Game Theory to analyze oligopoly behavior.

Characteristics of Oligopoly

  • Few Firms: Dominated by a few firms, high concentration ratio (e.g., no more than 7 firms with 70%+ market share).
  • Differentiated Goods: Firms are price makers with unique goods.
  • High Barriers to Entry/Exit:
    • Start-up costs, economies of scale, sunk costs, brand loyalty.
  • Interdependence:
    • Firms do not make independent decisions; they consider rivals' actions and reactions.
    • Results in price rigidity.
  • Non-Price Competition: Branding, advertising, product/service quality.
  • Objective Ambiguity: Profit maximization is not always the sole objective.

Real-World Examples

  • Global Examples:
    • Soft drinks (Coca-Cola, Pepsi).
    • Car industry.
    • OPEC (legal oligopoly).
  • UK Examples:
    • Supermarkets, energy industry, fuel providers.
    • Bus and airline markets.

The Kinked Demand Curve Model

Basic Concepts

  • Price Rigidity: Firms are disincentivized to change prices.
    • Elasticity Differences: Above the current price (P1), demand is price elastic; below, it is price inelastic.
  • Raising Price (P1 to P2):
    • Quantity demanded decreases more than price increase.
    • Rivals do not follow (undercut), resulting in loss of market share and revenue.
  • Lowering Price (P1 to P3):
    • Demand increases less than price decrease.
    • Rivals follow, leading to a price war and no long-term market share change.

Marginal Revenue Curve

  • Vertical Gap: Exists in the MR curve, signifying that within this gap, price remains at P1 despite cost changes.
  • Profit Maximization: Firms produce where MC = MR, ensuring price remains P1 if costs change within the MR gap.

Conclusions from the Model

  1. Price Competition:
    • Despite irrationality, firms may engage in price wars (e.g., UK supermarkets, short-haul airlines).
  2. Non-Price Competition:
    • Logical outcome if prices remain sticky (e.g., branding and advertising).
  3. Interdependence Issues:
    • Frustration due to constant consideration of rivalsโ€™ actions.
    • Temptation to collude, act like a monopoly, fix prices, and gain high profits.

Future Topics

  • Next lecture: Game Theory and its application in understanding oligopoly behavior.

Note: Stay tuned for more insights into oligopolistic market dynamics.