🏛️

KR day 28 2024

Apr 29, 2025

Lecture Transcript Notes

Introduction

  • Case: Commonwealth vs. Karen Reed
  • Date: Not specified
  • Judge: Justice Beverly Conon
  • Location: Northw Superior Court, County of Norfolk

Court Proceedings

Initial Proceedings

  • Jury not present initially.
  • Sidebar discussions with judge regarding motions.

Varder Motion

  • Motion related to Commonwealth’s renewed motion for reciprocal discovery and exclusion of defense expert Dr. Marie Russell.
  • Alleged violation of Rule 14's reciprocal discovery by the defense.
  • Judge found a violation but allowed Dr. Russell to testify with limitations.
  • Dr. Russell's testimony limited to whether marks on Jon O’Keefe’s arm were due to an animal attack, not on police activity or inconsistency with other injuries.

Other Motions

  • Commonwealth argued lack of reciprocal discovery for biomechanical experts Dr. Wolf and Dr. Renchler.
  • Dr. Wolf allowed to testify on involvement; concerns with Dr. Renchler’s expertise in medical causation.

Witness Testimony: Trooper Gino

Examination of Phones

  • Conducted forensic extraction on Karen Reed’s and Jon O’Keefe’s phones.
  • Relayed call logs and messages extracted from phones.
  • Highlighted specific times and contents from call logs and voicemails left by Karen Reed.

Analysis

  • Over 50 calls made from Karen Reed to Jon O’Keefe from around 12:30 a.m. to 6:00 a.m.
  • No evidence of answered calls indicating conversation.
  • Voicemails left by Karen Reed, timings and content presented.

GPS and Health Data

  • Analysis of GPS data from O’Keefe’s phone showing his location and movements.
  • Times and distances verified using GPS and health data indicating steps taken.

Legal Discussions and Motions

Google Search Motions

  • Commonwealth moved to introduce a Google search by the defendant for DUI attorneys at 1:27 p.m., arguing it rebuts defense and shows consciousness of guilt.
  • Defense argued it’s not probative and prejudicial.
  • Judge ruled probative value outweighed by prejudicial impact.

Examination of Trooper Gorino

  • Defense questioned Trooper Gorino’s qualifications and experience in forensic analysis.
  • Focused on inconsistencies in earlier reports regarding phone data and location data.
  • Discussed handling and securing of cell phone evidence post-seizure.

Medical Examination and Testimony

Dr. Renee Stonebridge

  • Neuropathologist conducted analysis on Jon O’Keefe’s brain.
  • Observed acute traumatic injuries and subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Dr. Irini Scordebello

  • Performed autopsy on Jon O’Keefe.
  • Determined cause of death as blunt impact injuries to head and hypothermia.
  • Manner of death listed as undetermined due to lack of information to classify as accident or homicide.
  • Reviewed external and internal examination findings.

Conclusion

  • The session included examining evidence, ruling on motions, and presenting witness testimonies to establish the narrative and facts surrounding the case.