Triceratops vs. Ankylosaurus Showdown

Introduction

• Most armed herbivorous land animal (Triceratops) vs. most armored land animal (Ankylosaurus).
• This is a hypothetical battle analysis.

Sponsorship

• Sponsored by Mech Arena.
• Mech Arena: a mobile game available on Android and iOS.
• Incentives: forest digital skin, 200 acorns, and 10,000 credits.

Dinosaur Background

• Triceratops
  • Largest ceratopsian in the Cretaceous period.
  • 30 feet in length, 10 feet tall, weighing up to 11.6 tons.
  • Main weapon: 1,000-pound head with deadly horns.
• Ankylosaurus
  • Most heavily armored dinosaur in the Cretaceous period.
  • 26 feet in length and 6 feet tall.
  • Armor: layered osteoderms strengthened by collagen fibers.
  • Main weapon: heavy tail club.

Analysis

Intelligence

• Triceratops: Higher encephalization quotient (EQ) compared to Ankylosaurus. -Brain larger in proportion to body size.
  • Smaller frontal lobe: not capable of complex problem-solving, but good instinctive behaviors.
• Ankylosaurus: Smaller EQ, heavily armored head with limited brain casing.
  • Instinctive defensive maneuvers and use of club tail.

Defense

• Triceratops: Large frill providing defensive capability; frill injuries indicate interlocking horn fights.
• Ankylosaurus: Heavier and more comprehensive armor with osteoderms.
  • Weakness: armor only covers the upper body, vulnerable lower parts.

Locomotion

• Triceratops: Agile with strong forelimbs, could run up to 15 mph.
• Ankylosaurus: Less agile, slower with a top speed of 6 mph.
  • Agile hind legs and tail for defensive maneuvers.

Weaponry

• Triceratops: Deadly horns (36,000 pounds of force) capable of goring and deep injuries.
  • Different species had different horn shapes affecting battle dynamics.
• Ankylosaurus: Tail club delivering fatal impacts (up to 14,360 newtons).
  • Strong enough to shatter bones and potentially break the skull of an opponent.

Outcome

• Overall Edge

  • Triceratops: Edge in intelligence and locomotion.
  • Ankylosaurus: Edge in defense.
  • Weaponry: draw, both capable of lethal damage.

• Likely Winner: Ankylosaurus would win most encounters due to better defense and strategy.

  • Triceratops is unlikely to die but would struggle to exploit Ankylosaurus' weaknesses.
  • Victory for Triceratops could happen by accident, less likely.
  • Ankylosaurus more likely to deal critical blows to Triceratops.

Conclusion

• Ankylosaurus wins most encounters.
• Triceratops has potential for victory but lacks cognitive ability to consistently exploit weaknesses.
• Engage with the audience: invite them to suggest other face-offs and comment.