📝

NEC4 ECI Webinar Summary

Jul 26, 2025

Summary

  • This NEC webinar focused on the use of the Early Contractor Involvement (ECI) Clause (X22) in NEC4 Engineering and Construction Contracts (ECC).
  • Presenters discussed the context, contract preparation, supplier selection, and contract management under NEC4 X22, with a focus on practical application rather than a clause-by-clause review.
  • Key issues addressed included the rationale for using Option C/E, approaches to pricing information, best practices in supplier selection, management of the submission and approval process, and the handling of open questions.
  • The session wrapped up with a Q&A, highlighting concerns around financial stability, incentive alignment, stage progression, budget management, and contractual adaptation.

Action Items

  • (No specific due date – NEC User Group Secretariat): Publish written answers to any unanswered webinar questions in the NEC User Group newsletter and/or on the website.
  • (Ongoing – Event Organizers): Share the recorded webinar on the NEC website and YouTube.
  • (October 11th – NEC Event Lead, Glasgow): Prepare and promote the upcoming NEC event in Glasgow on supply chain collaboration.
  • (By November 29th – NEC Asia-Pacific Team): Organize and promote the NEC Asia-Pacific User Group Conference in Hong Kong.

Introduction and Context of ECI in NEC4 ECC

  • The webinar introduced the NEC4 ECC X22 Early Contractor Involvement clause, which allows clients and contractors to collaborate early in a project's lifecycle.
  • ECI is primarily published for use with NEC4 contracts, particularly Option C and E, with modifications needed for Option A.
  • The focus of the session was on "middle ground" projects—those with established schemes and fairly defined budgets, where ECI can realize its full potential.

Rationale for X22 Use and Applicability

  • X22 was written for Options C (target contract with activity schedule) and E (cost reimbursable contract) because both involve risk sharing.
  • While ECI could theoretically be adapted for Option A (priced contract with activity schedule), it would require additional modified clauses to ensure contractor motivation and risk management align with ECI principles.
  • The intention is for both client and contractor to work towards best outcomes within an agreed target price and to use contractors’ existing estimation processes.

Contract Preparation and Pricing Information

  • In preparing ECI contracts, clients must specify what pricing information is required and how this will be used in setting and assessing stage 2 prices.
  • Pricing information should provide not just rates but an explanation or “story” about how prices are assessed, leveraging the contractor’s own systems.
  • Clarity is needed on the process and mechanism to be used for calculating stage 2 prices, ensuring transparency and mutual understanding.
  • It's important that information required at tender is also relevant and useful in contract execution.

Supplier Selection

  • Clients and contractors both benefit from openness: the contractor should disclose its pricing and estimation systems, while the client should clarify how submitted data will be used in selection.
  • A balance between technical, professional, and financial submissions is needed. Overemphasis on price alone is discouraged.
  • The selection process should give confidence in both the contractor’s competence and the appropriateness of their pricing methods.
  • The approach can potentially be adapted for subcontractor selection, though formal ECI processes for subs are uncommon and may encounter resistance.

Submissions and Stage Process Management

  • During stage one, ongoing submissions—including design proposals, budget forecasts, and programs—are expected, culminating in a comprehensive submission before stage two approval.
  • Submissions should address not just technical solutions but impact on budget and program, with enough design detail to support client approval but not all final details.
  • The contract allows client specification of the submission and review/acceptance procedure; successful process requires dialogue and staged review.

Stage Two Price Assessment and Budget Management

  • Assessment of stage two pricing should strictly follow the agreed process outlined in the contract and based on submitted pricing information.
  • Regular submissions and forecast updates should ensure there are no last-minute surprises regarding budget or program feasibility.
  • Project approval to move to stage two depends both on meeting technical requirements and remaining within the agreed budget; if not, adjustments or withdrawal are possible.

Contract Management Considerations

  • During stage one, standard NEC contract mechanisms (forecasting, early warnings) still apply, though some are less relevant if only stage one prices are in play.
  • The contract should clearly state the expected timeline for the client’s internal approval to move to stage two, treated as a program constraint.
  • Any approvals needed for project advancement (e.g., planning consent) must be obtained during stage one.

Handling of Design and Scope at Stage Two

  • Any remaining design to be completed in stage two must be clearly identified, as responsibility falls to the contractor.
  • The transition between stage one and stage two should be seamless, ensuring all approvals, design, and pricing details are ready before construction commitment.

Q&A and Additional Topics

  • Issues discussed included financial stability checks (a standard procurement rather than contractual issue), incentivizing contractor alignment with client goals, practicalities of design progression in stages, supply chain/subcontractor engagement, and rare instances of budget change triggers.
  • The adaptation of ECI for consultant contracts (e.g., PSC) was queried; it is technically possible but unusual and may complicate procurement law compliance.

Decisions

  • Focus on Option C/E for ECI (X22) in NEC4 — Because these options best align contractor motivation with collaborative risk-sharing, while Option A use would require substantial modification.
  • Stage 2 Approval Contingent on Meeting Budget and Program — Projects only proceed when stage two pricing and scope align with client budget and all requisite approvals are in place.

Open Questions / Follow-Ups

  • Written answers will be provided for any participant questions not addressed during the live session.
  • Follow-up needed on best practices for ECI adaptation to subcontractor engagement and any emerging issues with PSC (consultant) contract adaptation.
  • Clarity requested by participants about handling design changes and compensation if projects do not proceed to stage two.