⚖️

Understanding McDonald v. Chicago Case

Apr 21, 2025

Lecture Notes: McDonald v. Chicago

Introduction

  • Instructor: Heimlich
  • Topic: McDonald v. Chicago - a required Supreme Court case for the AP Government curriculum.
  • Objective: Understand the implications of the McDonald v. Chicago case and its relation to the Second Amendment and selective incorporation.

Background and Facts of the Case

  • Related Case: Heller v. District of Columbia (2008)
    • Outcome: Restrictive gun ownership laws in Washington D.C. were ruled unconstitutional.
    • Note: Applied only to federal territory (D.C.).
  • McDonald v. Chicago
    • Plaintiff: Otis McDonald, a grandfather and hunter.
    • Situation: McDonald wanted to own a handgun for self-defense due to local gang activity and previous robberies.
    • Issue: Chicago had very restrictive handgun laws.
    • Legal Question: Whether these laws violated McDonald's Second Amendment rights.

Constitutional Principle

  • Amendment Involved: Second Amendment - right to bear arms.
  • Arguments:
    • McDonald: Chicago's laws infringed upon Second Amendment rights, especially post-Heller case.
    • Opposition: Restrictive laws were necessary for public order and safety.
  • Court's Dilemma: Balancing personal liberty vs. public order and safety.

Court's Decision

  • Ruling: In favor of McDonald, finding Chicago's laws a violation of Second Amendment rights.
  • Key Point:
    • Not solely about the Second Amendment.
    • Involves the 14th Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause, which allows the Bill of Rights to apply to states.

Significance and Impact

  • Selective Incorporation:
    • Process by which Bill of Rights is applied to states via the 14th Amendment.
    • McDonald case extended Heller ruling to the states.
    • States and cities with similar laws had to adjust to align with the McDonald ruling.
  • Majority Opinion (Justice Samuel Alito): Recognized the right to bear arms as fundamental to ordered liberty.
  • Dissenting Opinion: Argued against gun ownership as a fundamental right.

Conclusion

  • Relevance: Understanding this case is crucial for exams and understanding constitutional rights related to state laws.

Additional Resources

  • Call to Action:
    • View packet for further study aids.
    • Explore videos on other Supreme Court cases.
    • Subscribe for additional content.

Closing

  • Instructor's Sign-off: "Heimler out"