🌎

U.S. Global Influence in the Early 1900s

Jan 22, 2025

Expansion of U.S. International Influence in the Early 20th Century

The Open Door Policy

  • Objective: Promote international trade in China among China, the U.S., and other countries.
  • Context: Anti-foreign uprising by Chinese nationalists (Boxers) threatened Westerners in China.
  • European powers considered dividing China into spheres of influence, causing concern for the U.S.
  • U.S. recently accessed Chinese markets post-annexation of the Philippines (1898).
  • Secretary of State John Hay (1899-1900) negotiated with Great Britain, France, Germany, Russia, and Japan.
    • Proposed maintaining open trade and preserving China's integrity (geographically and administratively).
  • Result: Agreement accepted by all except Japan, became U.S. policy for 40 years.

The Roosevelt Corollary (Big Stick Diplomacy)

  • Background: Expanded the Monroe Doctrine (1823) to prevent European colonization in the Western Hemisphere.
  • Policy: U.S. as a dominant force and "international police" in the Western Hemisphere.
  • Example: 1905 intervention in the Dominican Republic—U.S. repaid debts and appointed a new customs leader to prevent European intervention.
  • Modeled future U.S. involvement in Latin America.

The Great White Fleet

  • Purpose: Demonstrate U.S. naval power globally.
  • Action: 1907 Navy Armada sailed worldwide.
  • Strength: Smaller compared to European navies, faced challenges from Japan.
  • Context: Dissatisfaction from Japan over a 1905 treaty ending the Russo-Japanese War.
  • Criticism: Seen as a waste of money and a potential threat to Japan.
  • Outcome: Impressed global leaders, including Japan.

Dollar Diplomacy under President Taft

  • Approach: Preferred economic investment over military force.
  • Encouraged U.S. businesses to invest abroad, promoting American ideals.
  • Consequences: Led to U.S. interference in foreign politics.
    • Example: U.S. intervention in Nicaragua led to civil unrest and military intervention.
  • Result: Policy criticized as "dollar diplomacy," seen as a tool for political interference rather than exporting values.