🔍

KR Day 19 2024

Apr 29, 2025

Lecture Notes

Juror Instructions

  • Jurors were reminded to refrain from discussing the case or conducting independent research.
  • Clarification provided on what constitutes evidence:
    • Only witness answers under oath are considered evidence, not the questions asked.

Witness Testimony: Lieutenant Kevin O'Hara

  • Background:

    • Lieutenant in Massachusetts State Police for over 22 years.
    • Currently Team Commander for the State Police Special Emergency Response Team (C Team).
    • Responsibilities include search and rescue, security at large-scale events, evidence searches.
  • Incident Details:

    • On January 29, 2012, involved in a case concerning a death investigation in Canton.
    • Contacted by Lieutenant Brian Tully for assistance with an evidence search.
    • Described activation process for the C Team.
    • Weather conditions included a blizzard with 18-20 inches of snow.
  • Search Process:

    • Seven team members conducted a line search along a road in Canton.
    • Aim was to find tail light pieces and a missing sneaker.
    • Search challenged by snow drifts; items found at ground level near the curb.
    • Evidence included multiple pieces of tail light and a sneaker.
  • Follow-up and Analysis:

    • Offered to return for further search if needed.
    • GPS used to map evidence locations with a noted range of error.
    • Team's experience and instincts were crucial for search efficacy.

Witness Testimony: Maren Hartnett

  • Background:

    • Forensic Scientist at Massachusetts State Police crime laboratory.
    • Experienced in biological fluid identification and crime scene response.
  • Evidence Examination:

    • Examined black Lexus SUV in Canton PD garage.
    • Noted damage and collected samples including a tail light housing and apparent hair from the vehicle.
    • Conducted blood tests on vehicle components; results negative.
  • Additional Evidence Handling:

    • Collected a drinking glass and Solo cups with red-brown stains for further analysis.
    • Analyzed clothing for damage patterns and biological stains.
    • Conducted confirmatory tests on red-brown stains from clothing.
    • Coordinated with external labs for testing beyond in-house capabilities.

Witness Testimony: Ashley Vallier

  • Background:

    • Forensic Scientist in Trace Unit at Massachusetts State Police crime laboratory.
    • Specializes in gunshot residue analysis and physical match analysis.
  • Trace Analysis:

    • Examined debris and trace materials from clothing and crime scene.
    • Conducted physical match analysis to determine connections between evidence pieces.
    • Utilized a stereo Zoom microscope for detailed examination.
  • Evidence Handling:

    • Thorough documentation through notes and photographs.
    • Ensured accurate labeling and repackaged evidence appropriately post-analysis.

Conclusion

  • Detailed forensic processes and evidence handling were crucial in supporting the investigation.
  • The testimonies underscored the importance of methodical searches and rigorous documentation to maintain the integrity of evidence.