🕵️‍♂️

Crime Scene Investigation and Interrogation Techniques

Jul 21, 2024

Lecture Notes: Crime Scene Investigation and Interrogation Techniques

Emergency Call and Crime Scene

  • Date and Time: August 20, 2020, at 5 am.
  • Location: Sugar Creek Bridge.
  • Initial Report: Dead body mistaken for roadkill.
  • Victim: Deceased middle-aged woman, headless body with extensive bruising.
  • Position of Body: Stuffed under bridge's guardrail, upper body on road, legs hanging off the bridge.

Missing Person Report

  • Reporter: Michael Parks reported his wife, Hope Parks, missing.
  • Timeline: Last seen on a Tuesday following an argument.
  • Description Provided: Hope's tattoos, including a heart with Michael’s name.

Interrogation of Michael Parks

Initial Interrogation

  • Room Type: Soft interrogation room (used for victims)
  • Detective’s Approach: Informal, alleviates concerns by stating recording is for notes.
  • Michael’s Behavior: Shares about recent arguments over their son, control issues, facial and hand gestures indicating stress and anxiety.

Key Observations

  • Michael’s Negative Remarks: Constantly speaks negatively about his wife and son, shows potential control issues.
  • Behavioral Cues: Face-rubbing, mouth covering, genital covering, which signify anxiety and possibly hiding truth.
  • Admittance to Anger Issues: Takes medication for anger, claims never acted on it.

Interrogation Tactics

  • Tactful Questioning: Detective remains calm, non-confrontational to keep Michael talking.
  • Bait Question: Surprises Michael about the blood found in the house; Michael offers explanations about personal injuries and accidents.
  • Behavior under Pressure: Fidgeting when asked to consent to a house search, pacing when left alone.

Key Findings from the House Search

  • Blood Evidence: Blood found in various areas around and inside the house and garage.
  • Forensic Evidence: Hope’s severed head found in the basement, hidden under debris.
  • Michael’s Reaction: Limited emotion, exasperation rather than shock.

Michael’s Second Interrogation

Confession Details

  • Version of Events: Claims accidental shooting while cleaning gun, panicked and covered up the incident.
  • Discrepancies: Autopsy showed a contact wound, conflicting with his story.
  • Detectives Press: Offer alternative narratives to elicit a truthful confession.

Michael’s Behaviors and Responses

  • Physical Signs: Protective posture, frequent fidgeting, covering face when stressed.
  • Emotional Inconsistencies: Lack of genuine emotional responses, selective memory concerning dismemberment.
  • Slip-Up: Initially fails to mention argument during shooting, later admits.

Legal Rights Invocation

  • Initial Hesitation: Incomplete statement about needing a lawyer.
  • Final Statement: Clear request for an attorney, ending the interrogation.

Third Interrogation Attempt

  • Without Lawyer: Michael requests another meeting with detectives.
  • New Admissions: Detailed accidental shooting, stated panic as the reason for dismemberment.
  • Behavioral Indications: Lack of strong emotional response when recounting the incident.

Court Case and Conclusion

Evidence Against Michael

  • Premeditation Evidence: Online search history on improvised gun silencers proved premeditation.
  • Court Outcome: Michael Parks changed plea to guilty, accepted plea deal.
  • Sentence: 50 years without parole, release projected in 2070.

Communication with Michael Parks

  • Requests: Demands including monetary compensation and specific items in exchange for his side of the story.
  • Response Status: Awaiting further communication from Michael Parks.

Key Learnings:

  • Interview Techniques: Importance of non-confrontational approach, bait questioning.
  • Behavioral Analysis: Subtle cues indicating stress, deception, such as face-touching, protective postures.
  • Evidence Handling: Importance of forensic evidence in corroborating or refuting suspect’s stories.
  • Legal Processes: Suspect’s invocation of right to attorney must be clear for statements to be inadmissible.