Coconote
AI notes
AI voice & video notes
Try for free
⚖️
Post-Mexican-American War Consequences
Nov 18, 2024
Lecture Notes: The Crisis and Consequences Post-Mexican-American War
Consequences of American Victory in the Mexican-American War
Reopening of the Slavery Debate:
The victory led to a debate over slavery, causing a sectional crisis in the 1850s.
This crisis eventually led to the secession crisis and the Civil War.
Election of 1848
James K. Polk:
Polk declines re-election due to health and previous promise.
Died shortly after leaving office.
Candidates:
Louis Cass (Democrat): Followed Jacksonian principles.
Zachary Taylor (Whig): Campaigned against the expansion of slavery, war hero.
Martin Van Buren (Free Soil Party): Anti-slavery, gained 10% popular vote, no electoral votes.
Outcome:
Zachary Taylor wins presidency.
The Crisis of 1850
Origins:
Rooted in the territory acquired from Mexico.
Wilmot Proviso (1846):
Proposed that territories gained from Mexico be free of slavery.
Introduced by David Wilmot before territory acquisition.
Aimed to prevent slavery debate; however, it started it earlier.
Sectional Response:
South:
Saw it as an insult, questioned the implication on Southern slavery.
North:
Supported by anti-slavery individuals, halted the spread of slavery.
The Slavery Question and Debate
Principles of Each Side:
North:
Implicitly argued slavery is wrong by preventing its expansion.
South:
Viewed slavery as a positive social good, existential for Southern way of life.
Slavery Question:
Does Congress have the right to stop the spread of slavery into new territories?
Steps to Answer the Slavery Question
Read the Constitution:
Congress governs territories (Article 4, Section 3).
Look for Past Precedents:
Missouri Compromise (3630 line) as precedent.
North's Argument
Constitutional Basis:
Congress controls territories and can set laws, including slavery laws.
Precedent:
3630 line from Missouri Compromise restricted slavery's expansion.
South's Argument
John C. Calhoun's Senate Resolutions (1847):
Fifth Amendment protects property; slaves seen as property.
Argued against restricting slavery as it deprived the South of property.
Inequality Argument:
Northerners can take property anywhere; Southerners cannot.
Middle Ground - Popular Sovereignty
Proponents:
Stephen Douglas and Louis Cass.
Concept:
Citizens of territories decide on slavery through vote once a population benchmark is reached.
Conclusion
Debate on Slavery Question:
Each section’s view presented: North, South, and middle ground (popular sovereignty).
Upcoming Discussion:
Other issues related to the crisis of 1850 and the Compromise itself.
📄
Full transcript