That our origins may have been quite a bit humbler than we thought. The Badlands of Wyoming. Some of the largest dinosaur bones ever were found right here.
But University of Florida paleontologist Jonathan Block is hunting for a set of bones that are nothing like the giant bones of T. rex. Here's a little piece of bone here.
Here's a little piece of bone. I think that's a little vertebra. Tiny mouse-sized bones.
bones buried in limestone that just might be the fossil remains of our earliest primate ancestors. An age-old mystery surrounds the origin of primates. No one knows exactly where we come from or how we got our evolutionary start. Here's what we do know. Giant dinosaurs once ruled this basin where they dined freely in a lush forest.
But then, around 65 million years ago, the dinosaurs die off when a massive comet slams into the planet. Ten million years later, something extraordinary happens. The fossil record suddenly shows a new kind of mammal with unique characteristics. The primate, our ancient ancestors. So what is a primate?
What is it that separates us from the rest of the evolutionary pack? Well, maybe it's our good looks or our superior intelligence. The truth is, brain size does come into play. We primates, even Noah here, have larger brains than our mammal relatives.
It's a feature that evolved to help us learn complex social behavior and how to do things like make tools or even outwit our prey. We also developed forward-facing eyes with stereo vision. It's a feature that allows us to judge the world around us in 3D. Over time we also developed the ability to leap, basically to jump from branch to branch. Where grasping hands, or in Noah's case, grasping feet, equipped with nails instead of claws, enable us to reach that tasty piece of fruit.
Our earliest ancestors developed these unique characteristics sometime after the extinction of dinosaurs. The question is, when and why? So, let me get it straight. If the dinosaurs went extinct about 65 million years ago and then... If a primate suddenly appeared around 56 million years ago, what happened in between?
I mean, that's almost 10 million years that's unaccounted for. Right. That's a $6 million question, and I don't think they just appeared on the face of the planet. They evolved.
But from what? Something the size of a mouse? Exactly.
Jonathan believes the evidence to support his theory and help solve this ancient primate mystery can be found here, hidden inside the limestone of the Bighorn Basin. A tiny little piece of broken bone can connect up with an entire skeleton of a mammal. This looks like a pretty good limestone.
It should be full of fossils. We won't really know until we get it back to the lab. You see a tiny little piece of bone and you hope that there's more inside. You have no guarantees.
So it's a little bit of a gamble. But a gamble worth taking because these stones might hold ancient clues. These limestones allow us a window into that world that we've never had before. The world of the earliest primate.
It'll take a 2,000-mile drive back to his lab in Gainesville, Florida, and a year of painstaking work to find out if Jonathan's gamble will pay off. Oh, that's true. Back in his lab, Jonathan, along with... graduate student Doug Boyer get to work. That's not just like being a tail.
Their goal, to free the delicate bones from the rock-hard stone. They begin by placing the limestone under a microscope. That immediately starts to open up the world of the block.
We identify all of the bone that's outcropping on the surface. Doug carefully coats the tiny bones with plastic to protect them from the powerful acid bath they're about to take. We leave the block in acid for at the most two to two and a half hours and that'll remove about a millimeter thick rind of limestone.
We repeat the process again and again and again and again until all of the bone is exposed. Much to their surprise, they find hundreds of tiny bones. But success poses a new problem.
It's not always obvious which bones go to what animal. So the only way to document that is by creating a little archaeology site, a map of all the bones. Doug devises a method to meticulously document the relationship between each and every bone.
The process will take months. But when complete, it will reveal far more than they ever anticipated. Dozens of tiny mammals never before seen, including these three extraordinary skeletons.
And what are these? These are Plesiidaeperforms. Plesiidaeperforms are tiny mouse-like creatures that lived during the mysterious 10 million year period between the extinction of dinosaurs and the appearance of primates.
It's a very diverse group with more than 120 species, including these three. They represent the most complete skeletons of Plesiidaeper forms known in the world. An extraordinary find for sure, but will they help Jonathan solve this primate mystery? Are Plesiidaeper forms our earliest ancestors? If we look here, this nail-like structure makes you think.
Because the presence of a nail is a hallmark characteristic of living primates. This is an enlarged image of the extraordinary nail Jonathan found. Next to it, the claw he expected.
A startling difference. This nail might actually be the first nail in the history of primate evolution. Concrete evidence to support his theory of primate evolution.
Could there be more hidden within these tiny bones? To find out, Jonathan enlists the help of Mary Silcox, evolutionary anthropologist at the University of Winnipeg. She's been busy zapping primitive skulls with an industrial-strength cat scanner large enough to fill an entire room.
Mary takes the skull of one of the limestone skeletons and prepares it for scanning. The x-ray goes through the specimen and we collect 2,400 separate views, which produce a cross-sectional image. We go through the data.
A structure that had been identified as just a little piece of bone in the middle ear actually had the form of a tube. And the reason that was exciting was because there was a structure running through the ear of particularly primitive primates, things like lemurs. which is a tube for a large vessel that goes to the brain.
A tiny tube. A tiny nail. The evidence is mounting.
But to prove his theory of primate evolution, Jonathan still needs more. He adds another member to the team, Eric Sargis, professor of anthropology at Yale University and the world's leading expert on tree shrews. Why a tree shrew expert?
Scientists believe that... tree shrews, a primitive species of tiny tree living mammals, are actually related to early primates. Tree shrews are not primates, but they're close relatives.
They share a number of characteristics that separates them from other groups of mammals. Would Plesiidaeperforms pass the ultimate primate test? Are they the first step on the primate family tree, or just another relative on the tree shrew family tree?
What we're interested in was to test whether or not Plesiopepiformes were the earliest primates. The team goes to work bringing together all the information they had collected independently into a single comprehensive study. Jonathan and Doug's Plesiopepiformes skeletons, Mary's scans of dozens of ancient skulls, and Eric's anatomical data on a close living relative, the tree shrew.
The way we start is by comparing all these specimens. Detail by detail, feature by feature, they combed through all the data using a numerical system to compare and contrast. After we studied the different characteristics of these animals and reduced them down to numbers, you know, absence of a nail is a zero, presence of a nail is a one.
We then ran this through a computer algorithm. The algorithm sifted through the complex data in search of simple relationships. Which fossils have the same characteristics, the same numbers?
Using this information, the computer was programmed to create family trees, illustrating the potential relationships each mammal has to the next. The team expected the computer to come up with several possible scenarios in the form of several possible family trees. Instead, the program came up with only one.
Yeah, I see. I was a little surprised to see it so unambiguous. This single family tree could lead to only one conclusion.
I think the evidence as it stands today is pretty compelling that, yes, in fact, these are primates. Every new piece of data that we had coming out of our study of this material seemed to be consistent with that idea. Not only that, one of the...
Plesiodaperform skeletons Jonathan and Doug painstakingly etched out of limestone, a species by the name of Dryomomes, turns out to be far more primitive than the other two, possessing only one primate characteristic, the shape of its teeth. It's sort of a transitional specimen between more primitive things like tree shrews and later primates. One part primate, other parts not. I mean it really starts to tell us something about the base of the primate tree, what the earliest primates look like. So if we're one leaf on the branch so are chimpanzees, gorillas, orangutans, among apes, all the different monkeys in the old world and the new world, lemurs from Madagascar, lorises and galagos, all of those animals are living today but you can trace it all back to a single common ancestor and as you get closer and closer to that common ancestor Dryomomes is one of the animals that's closest to the base there.
It's the most primitive primate skeleton ever found, to date. Jonathan had evidence to support his theory. Primates didn't just appear on the planet.
They evolved over a 10 million year period. And just as he thought, the earliest primates were the size of a mouse. Still, one question remains. What sparked this amazing transformation?
The team believes our ancient ancestors evolved on the heels of a mass extinction. Without the mighty T-Rex around, the tiniest of mammals are free to forage and explore. And they discover a world filled with flowering plants and succulent fruit.
We have this sort of co-evolutionary relationship where fruits were evolving to get tastier for primates to eat. The primates were then eating them and helping the plants actually spread their seeds further. With tempting fruit growing at the end of tiny branches, our ancestors have plenty of motivation to change. So they begin to evolve, developing long fingers for climbing trees, specialized teeth, hands and feet uniquely designed for grasping and eating the tiniest tasty berry. Over 10 million years, they slowly develop unique characteristics that we recognize in our primate relatives and ourselves.
So that if plesiadapiforms don't evolve, then we're probably not standing here talking about this right now.