📜

Hamilton's Case for a Single Executive

May 3, 2025

Federalist 70 by Alexander Hamilton

Introduction

  • Focuses on the necessity of a single executive (president) for the functioning of the government.
  • Response to Anti-Federalist concerns about monarchical power.
  • Anti-Federalists proposed a council of executives to prevent tyranny.

Argument for a Single Executive

  • Energy in the Executive:
    • Hamilton's main argument is the need for energy, which is essential for good government.
    • A single executive can act quickly and decisively, unlike the legislative branch which is slow and deliberate.

Benefits of Energy

  1. Unity

    • One executive ensures decision, activity, secrecy, and dispatch.
    • More executives lead to less energy and diminished office effectiveness.
    • Historical examples show multiple executives lead to division and hinder effectiveness.
    • In emergencies, division among executives could impede critical measures.
  2. Responsibility

    • A single executive makes it clear who is accountable for actions and decisions.
    • In a system with multiple executives, it becomes difficult to pinpoint responsibility for mismanagement or failures.
    • Ensures people know who to blame and replace if the executive acts corruptly.

Conclusion

  • Despite risks of monarchical power, a single executive better fulfills the role with energy and decisiveness.
  • Clear accountability in case of corruption or failure.

Additional Resources

  • Review packet available for a deeper understanding and exam preparation.

This summary provides a high-level overview of the key points from Federalist 70, focusing on Hamilton's justification for a single executive and its benefits.