Federalist 70 by Alexander Hamilton
Introduction
- Focuses on the necessity of a single executive (president) for the functioning of the government.
- Response to Anti-Federalist concerns about monarchical power.
- Anti-Federalists proposed a council of executives to prevent tyranny.
Argument for a Single Executive
- Energy in the Executive:
- Hamilton's main argument is the need for energy, which is essential for good government.
- A single executive can act quickly and decisively, unlike the legislative branch which is slow and deliberate.
Benefits of Energy
-
Unity
- One executive ensures decision, activity, secrecy, and dispatch.
- More executives lead to less energy and diminished office effectiveness.
- Historical examples show multiple executives lead to division and hinder effectiveness.
- In emergencies, division among executives could impede critical measures.
-
Responsibility
- A single executive makes it clear who is accountable for actions and decisions.
- In a system with multiple executives, it becomes difficult to pinpoint responsibility for mismanagement or failures.
- Ensures people know who to blame and replace if the executive acts corruptly.
Conclusion
- Despite risks of monarchical power, a single executive better fulfills the role with energy and decisiveness.
- Clear accountability in case of corruption or failure.
Additional Resources
- Review packet available for a deeper understanding and exam preparation.
This summary provides a high-level overview of the key points from Federalist 70, focusing on Hamilton's justification for a single executive and its benefits.