⚖️

Understanding Civil Process ADR Methods

May 15, 2025

Civil Process ADR (Alternative Dispute Resolution)

Overview

  • This video is the second tutorial on ADR.
  • Focus on advantages and disadvantages of different ADR methods.
  • Methods discussed: Negotiation, Mediation, Conciliation, and Arbitration.

Negotiation

  • Definition: Simplest form of ADR involving direct resolution between parties.
  • Advantages:
    • Privacy: Discussions remain confidential between parties.
    • Quick Resolution: Potentially faster than court.
    • Relationship Maintenance: Helps maintain business/personal relationships.
    • Informal: Can be conducted casually (e.g., meeting in a cafe).
  • Disadvantages:
    • Costly if solicitors are involved.
    • Time and money wasted if settlement is delayed until court date.
    • Perceived as a compromise, potentially yielding less than court.
    • May not provide emotional closure for angry parties.

Mediation

  • Definition: Involves a neutral third party to assist in resolution.
  • Advantages:
    • Private and Confidential.
    • Voluntary process encourages cooperation.
    • Cost-effective and accessible.
    • Good for relationship maintenance.
    • High success rate (80% settlement rate).
  • Disadvantages:
    • Mediator's role is facilitative, not directive.
    • Requires willingness to compromise from both parties.
    • Not legally binding.
    • Potential for unequal settlements.
    • Seen as increasingly compulsory in some instances (e.g., divorces).

Conciliation

  • Definition: Similar to mediation but with a more active role by the conciliator.
  • Advantages:
    • Cheaper than court.
    • Private and Confidential.
    • Active role by conciliator providing solutions.
    • Forward-looking, can prevent future disputes (e.g., ACAS in employment disputes).
  • Disadvantages:
    • Depends on conciliator's skill.
    • Requires willingness to compromise.
    • Not legally binding, may end up in court.

Arbitration

  • Definition: Formal ADR where parties submit to a third party's decision.
  • Advantages:
    • Binding decision enforceable by courts.
    • Parties choose arbitrator and procedures.
    • Little/no publicity compared to court.
    • Expertise from arbitrators in relevant fields.
  • Disadvantages:
    • Possible unequal representation between parties.
    • No legal aid, potentially expensive.
    • Limited appeals.
    • May lack emotional closure of a court case.