👎

Harsh Review of Gravity Falls Show

May 25, 2025

Gravity Falls Review: Grade F

Overview

  • Author: Aaron James Hills
  • Published on HubPages, updated: June 3, 2020
  • The review gives Gravity Falls a failing grade, calling it "garbage in the form of a show."

Critiques of Gravity Falls

  • Described as overrated, boring, and terrible.
  • Claims the show is praised as both a children's show and adult entertainment, which the author finds contradictory.
  • Criticizes the show for allegedly stealing ideas from older TV melodramas like "Twin Peaks" and "Murder, She Wrote," as well as other supernatural-themed shows and American sitcoms like "The Simpsons."
    • Mentions similar settings from other shows: Derry, Maine (It), Eerie Indiana, Cicely, Alaska (Northern Exposure).

Character Analysis

  • Dipper: Compared to a combination of Lisa and Bart Simpson; described as a whiny know-it-all.
  • Mabel: Likened to Lisa Simpson post-brain injury or a female Bart Simpson; criticized for being less likable.
  • Old Man Stan: Compared to the old man from "Up" mixed with Homer Simpson but lacking charm.
  • Bill Cipher (referred to as "mister tortilla chip"): Criticized for being a clichéd villain.
  • Grunkle Ford (introduced later): Mentioned briefly without detailed analysis.
  • Soos and Wendy: Compared unfavorably to characters from "Family Guy."

Style and Animation

  • Criticizes the art style as lazy and uninspired.
  • Claims the show uses a basic character design template similar to other modern cartoons.

Broader Criticism of Modern Cartoons

  • Mentions similar criticisms of other shows like "Adventure Time," "Steven Universe," and "Star vs. the Forces of Evil."
  • Expresses disdain for the animation style prevalent in Disney Channel and Cartoon Network productions.

Additional Points

  • Mentions alleged controversies surrounding the show's creator.
  • Criticizes the fan base as "vapid" and "similarly minded morons."

Conclusion

  • Overall, the review is extremely negative, focusing on perceived lack of originality, poor character development, and unappealing art style.
  • Suggested that the show contributes to a broader trend of subpar animation in modern cartoons.