Transcript for:
Global Tensions and Preparedness

This is your World War II update. Assassination attempts in Colombia, widespread riots starting in the United States, and the 99% chance of nuclear Armageddon. That's what we're going to talk about today. I'm surprised that the deportation riots didn't start sooner. If some of you recall on the Canadian Prepper channel, that was one of my predictions once Trump took office is that after the first ICE arrests, you would start to see protests. But it didn't happen as quickly as I expected. It's finally materialized and now it's likely here to stay. Rumor has it Trump may invoke the insurrection act to deploy the National Guard in Los Angeles. I'm not there so I don't understand the extent of the rockus riotist behavior. But I presume it is only going to continue to intensify because now media attention is going to be paid towards this particular issue. It's a convenient way of course to take attention away from the even bigger problem that is currently on my mind and that is the risk of nuclear Armageddon. We are getting very very close. Now I want to share a very thoughtprovoking and ominous article that was written by a Russian statesman named Alexander Nazerov who was a Middle Eastern diplomat. I had this shared with me today and sometimes I like hearing it in somebody else's words because it just helps me to know that my uh inductions and inferences are on the right path and it makes it abundantly clear that Russia cannot sustain a conventional war against NATO no matter what all of the controlled opposition is trying to say. I'm not going to get into what I mean by controlled opposition, but for those of you who are in the know, you know. Now, what's happened in the last 24 hours is quite striking. We have the Ukrainians who did a 130 strong drone strike on a Russian military train that took out 13 tanks, they claim. Now, you got to really maybe reduce these numbers by 2/3 to get the truth. But regardless, this of course is just yet another in a string of massive attacks on critical infrastructure, military infrastructure, and civilian terrorist attacks. Seven artillery systems, 13 tanks, 103 armored and automotive vehicles, 10 fuel tankers, one locomotive, and a partridge and a pair tree. A Ukrainian strike on the Azot chemical plant in Tula, Russia. We have a lucil oil refinery that was destroyed in Nisnney Novagarad hit by Ukrainian kamicazi drone. So so much for that uh day tant on uh the attacks on critical infrastructure both inside Russia and Ukraine. You're going to see the oil price start to spike from here on in. Ukrainian forces have struck the Eurochem nitrogen plant in Russia's Tula region with kamicazi drones. Now, the Ukrainians weren't the only ones that scored some points. The Russians hit back with 53 Shahed drones, one missile, and three dead, 21 injured in the Karkov region. They had to relocate their strategic bombers. Two of them, the TU160 bombers, moved to the far east, which is only 660 miles from US territory. I wonder if that is some form of strategic signaling. Germany is planning the rapid expansion of its bomb-proof bunkers. They're going to be upgrading uh up to 2,000 Cold War era bunkers. Currently, only 580 are operational as they prepare for World War II. And the US Air Force is getting ready to deploy more nukes once the arms force control treaty ends. Okay. And the Russians are also claiming to have taken out a, and this is not falsifiable, which it never really is, a bunker inside Kiev that was home to 53 Storm Shadow missiles and some NATO officers, but we're never ever going to know. Now, if that all seems underwhelming, considering the beating that Russia has been taken lately and the beating that it is going to continue to take as Ukraine continues to ramp up its drone production and all NATO leaders continue to look the other way as they've now realized that, hey, we don't even necessarily need to do long range missile strikes because we can just overwhelm them with drones. What does Stalin say? quantity is a quality of its own. If we can exhaust their air defense, get them spread as thin as possible, we can continue with our reconnaissance by fire exercise, map out all of their air defense and their territory from the inside out, then we do the decapitation nuclear strike. Now, listen to what Alexander Nazerov has to say, okay? He's going to put it in words that I perhaps am not capable of. The Russian Ministry of Defense said yesterday that it launched a strike on Ukraine in response to an attack on bases housing Russia's strategic aviation. This means the bone thrown to the public to silence it turned out to be smaller than I had imagined. And I will say that we haven't quite allowed the Russians to perhaps fully respond. They could do something more grandiose in the coming days ahead. We just have to wait. But for now, it appears as though that was the retaliation. Bloggers are pissed. Trump responded by saying they, the Ukrainians, gave Putin an excuse to bomb them heavily last night. This is a public thank you to Putin for his support because if the Russian response had been devastating, Trump would have been forced into a war with Russia, something he is already very close to. But the trap hasn't fully closed yet. You see, the people that know what's going on, the people who aren't just shilling or controlled opposition, me and a buddy of mine have a new nickname for these guys. is we call them the Vaselines because you know if you want to make things a little bit uh if you want to make the truth a little bit more frictionless then you just apply a little bit of uh Vaseline right so there's a certain army of former intelligence officers out there right now who seem to always minimize the attacks that Russia is sustaining and maximizing the attacks that Russia inflicts Now, who does that serve? Something to think about. Anyways, accordingly, there are two possible interpretations of Moscow's choice not to succumb to these provocations by NATO, which may operate separately or together at the same time. Number one, an attempt to save Trump, who is in a difficult position, as he is seen as Russia's preferred option. He failed to get out of Ukraine, but still undermines Western unity. So, not because they like Trump, but because he's an agent of chaos, and there's currently riots in LA. That's why they like him because, of course, those domestic issues are going to potentially occupy Trump. But I think the 4D chess that they're not thinking about is that that is going to create a diversion away from the escalation of the war with Russia. Also, as I wrote in the article, and this is number two, this confirms Russia's refusal to engage in a conventional war with the West because such a war would quickly escalate into a full-scale nuclear conflict. If this was theoretically clear before, it now requires no further clarification. The opposing side should have no doubt. This conclusion has been repeatedly and convincingly confirmed. Therefore, Britain, Europe, and the West as a whole will now double their provocations and test the possibility of a preemptive strike decapitation strike hypothesis, anybody? And since the inertial trajectory of the situation, the endless escalation of strikes on Russian strategic targets, which is only going to continue, cannot end in anything other than Russia's defeat. nuclear conflict is already a 90% probability. It's just a matter of time. These provocations, you see, people think this is just going to end somewhere. When is it going to end? The goal is Russia's strategic defeat. It ends in a mushroom cloud. That's why we have these to prepare for what's coming. These provocations are heating up public opinion in Russia and sooner or later Putin will be forced to make the decision and I can I can feel it coming. What is that that song uh by is that the weekend? I feel it coming. Yeah, maybe not a good Okay, I apologize for that. You know, there's an old uh the military they used to call it blowing their wad. I think that was in the movie uh The Miracle Mile. Go watch The Miracle Mile. Excellent nuclear war movie. It's all about a guy who figures out that the world's going to end and he's freaking out and he's trying to tell people he's got the Cassandra complex going on. I can relate. The fact that the Kremlin has refused to go down the nuclear escalation ladder right now, meaning abandoning nuclear intimidation, does not mean that Putin will not use nuclear weapons, nor that we cannot slide into a path of gradual nuclear escalation later. But the lack of response now simply means that a preemptive nuclear strike against the West has become one of the most likely options. As Putin has said earlier, if a fight is inevitable, you punch first. In this world war, the winner will be the one who is willing to destroy the planet and die himself. For Russia, the situation is complicated by the fact that the West is going to die anyways. Now clearly this is an eastern perspective. So take that portion with a grain of salt. But this is the sentiment on the street day after day. Oil refinery, chemical plant after chemical plant, train after train, military base, ammo depot, air base. Every single day it's getting crazy out there. And you're not hearing a lick about this in the Western media, which is absolutely terrifying. really put that in perspective. We are at a point where we the the closer we get, the less they are talking about it. Isn't that weird? For Russia, the situation is more complicated by the fact that the West is going to die anyways. The internal crisis in Iran has no solution except for the fall of the West and the death of its ruling elite, possibly even a physical death. This means the West has nothing to lose and will die regardless. This is a translation from Arabic by chat GPT of this article. So if there's any, you know, things that don't quite seem intelligible, then I apologize. So it can raise the states stakes infinitely. Putin has only two options if he even wants a chance at victory and there is no guarantee. Either you launch a preemptive nuclear strike on the West now or wait until the fall of his regime and the imminent death of Russia becomes unavoidable and then launch the preemptive strike on the West. Isn't that a crazy set of options? Preemptive strike now or after your government is on the brink of collapse. Personally, I would be happy to live a few more years in a modern society with all the benefits of civilization. I would too. I'm interested in seeing this AI thing unfold. Maybe that will unify us as a species. Or just live a few more years at all. That's why I lean toward believing that strategic patience is necessary. No one is late to meet God. We will all have a time to die. So, there's no need to rush. But for Russia as a civilization and as a state, it might be better to start the nuclear war sooner and not with a western strike, but with a Russian preemptive nuclear strike. I was left speechless when I read that the first time because it really does put it in perspective. Now, that is the worstc case scenario. There's lots of other scenarios, but along this trajectory, they all involve nuclear weapons. I don't think that the implication there is that you notice how he started off by saying if the Russian response was too heavy-handed, then Trump would have to enter the war. Well, what did he mean by that? because that that means that there is this red line somewhere that exists in this conflict with Ukraine. We don't know where it is. There a de facto member of NATO. Is there secrets there? People talk about the labs and all the shenanigans and the corruption that is likely etched deep into the archives and the bunkers of Ukraine. But there has to be a red line there somewhere if that is the truth. And this explains a lot. If we take the most parsimmonious explanation of why Putin has been so reluctant to extend the boundaries of this conflict beyond Ukraine and continues to circumscribe it to these Oblasts in particular, eventually sending drones of course into the western parts of Ukraine, but uh nothing beyond the boundaries and nothing it seems. teams uh that are targeting the decisionmaking sensors uh centers of Ukraine, which is proven to work. If you take out the chain of command, that's demonstrated to work in almost every war. So this rationale, they got to keep Zalinsky alive because they got to sign the papers and they don't want to create power vacuums and the devil, you know, is better than one, it just doesn't really add up. There's a red line in there and what they're saying is if they were to do that, if they were to go to that extent of full-on declaring war against Ukraine, that means a war against the West. So, is there room for the limited use of tactical nuclear weapons? I would suspect there is. I would suspect that the only way that you are going to get out of this without a full-blown nuclear war, and I'm not advocating for this, this is just a reality at this rate. If this keeps going, the only way you get out of this situation without a mutually assured destruction scenario is the limited use of tactical nuclear weapons on the battlefield on a military facility or some demonstrative strike somewhere in an attempt to employ the escalate to deescalate strategy. It worked in World War II. It could potentially work again. However, the other thing that this guy was saying in his article was that the West perhaps doesn't want to survive. Maybe the elites are just bored of life. They're bored of, you know, just living high on the hog and frivolously and they're now to a point where they're like, you know what, if we can't have it all, then uh we're going to burn the whole thing down. We're going to go scorched earth. We got bunkers and hey, we got to get rid of these useless eaters anyways because UBI is coming and you know that's going to be a lot of paperwork that we don't want to do when AI replaces all the jobs. So eventually they're going to have some sort of kill shot, right? I mean what's the use of having all these humans around if AI can do the job better? Especially when you have the ability to genetically clone superior human beings. So the war on the terran is coming and hey if we want to drop the temperature of the planet a couple degrees maybe nuclear war can assist in that capacity as well. So there's no escape. There's no escape. I sit here next to this solar array that we set up last year. And as I think about this more and more, you think about AI, you think about autonomous weapons, you think about domestic unrest, global unrest, it's coming at us from every possible angle. But we must fight to survive. If you don't have that burning fire inside you, then you're probably not going to make it too long when this pops off, because it really could pop off at any moment. And that doesn't mean that it's just going to be anarchy and Mad Max. We're going to have to contend with authoritarian fifoms that are going to be leveraging technology. And I know this sounds fantastical. I get it. This probably sounds like the the ramblings of a madman. Well, I mean, the madman told you last year that there was going to be ICE deportation riots, and here we are. I've told you that the war wasn't going to end and that it's only going to intensify under Trump and here we are. Yet, you know, it it it's just incredible, too, because the stigma is starting to reemerge with preparedness and what we talk about. And, you know, it seems like people either fall into a camp of you're crazy or you're right, but I wouldn't want to live in that world anyways. I'm here to tell you, you're not going to want to die and you're not going to want to see your family die. You're not going to take the cyanide pill when Skynet takes over if you aren't just some sort of exception to the natural law, Darwinian laws, natural selection. And what I mean by that is I think a lot of people walking around right now wouldn't be if natural selection was still in play. Thanks to artificial selection, there's a lot of NPCs out there. And uh I don't mean that like to demean life, you know, all life is valuable. Those people's lives are valuable. But it seems like some people just have absolutely no fight or survival instinct within them whatsoever. And it's obvious because people are oblivious to these mounting threats. It's like the more threats emerge, the dumber and more distracted people get. It's just like the media thing. The the greater the stakes are being raised. You don't even find the Ukrainian war on good luck finding it on any major western media news site. Now, periodically they might post something, you know, if there's like some sort of acute salient crisis that emerges that's newsworthy for a few hours, they'll post about that. But by and large, like the bomber thing, they talked about that a little bit. They didn't talk about it enough and they didn't talk about it uh in the right context to truly understand uh what its implications are. Anyways guys, it's rainy out, but uh it's movie day with the kids, so I got to get inside and do that. Thanks for watching. Don't forget to like, comment, subscribe, and go over to the Canadian Prepper channel. We're interviewing Tom Morazzo, a rather controversial figure due to his associationship with the truckers convoy, but he was also a 25-year veteran. He's written a book on roen he's wrote a book on the emergency preparedness planning and I would encourage you to go check it out because you have to have a plan. You got to war game these things. And I tell you that interview woke some things up for me. It's very seldom nowadays. I always get something from my guests but it's very seldom that I get actionable information at this point. And that was one of those videos where he really uh has motivated me to make a plan for the various contingencies above and beyond just generalized prepping. We have to have plans for how we're going to deal with the hordes that are pouring through the doors. The hordes coming through the doors. There's a nice rhyme for a t-shirt. Okay, pardon the irreverence, but uh you got to have a little bit of fun nowadays because that's how we stay sane. This is how I stay sane, guys. Can't all just be doom and gloom. Doom, gloom, and boom. That's the new thing in AI. Boom. You know, Skynet recursive learning. Wow. Interesting times. See you on the flip side.