✝️

Filioque Debate: Orthodoxy vs Catholicism

Aug 31, 2024

Filioque: Eastern Orthodoxy vs. Catholicism

Main Topic

  • Filioque: Term concerning the eternal hypostatic origin of the Holy Spirit.
  • Eastern Orthodox Position: Holy Spirit proceeds from the Father alone.
    • The Father alone communicates the Divine Essence to the Holy Spirit.
  • Catholic Position: Holy Spirit proceeds from the Father and the Son.
    • The Father and the Son communicate the Divine Essence to the Holy Spirit through one principle of spiration.

Through the Son

  • Eastern Orthodox view: Holy Spirit's procession from the Father through the Son shouldn't imply causality from the Son.
    • Council of Blachernae: Condemned the view that the Spirit receives its being from the Son.
  • Catholic view: "Through the Son" can indicate the Spirit's eternal manifestation or economic procession.
    • The Council of Florence supported the dual procession argument.

Eternal Manifestation

  • Majority View: Energetic procession equals eternal manifestation.
  • Minority View: They are distinct concepts.
  • Catholic Argument: The Holy Spirit's reception of essence and being from both Father and Son indicates a shared spiration.

Theological Arguments

  1. Father and Son Spiration

    • The Father gives all to the Son except paternity.
    • The Father spirates, therefore the Son spirates.
    • Scriptural Basis: John 16: All that the Father has is mine.
  2. Relation of Persons

    • Distinction in the Trinity based on relations of opposition.
    • Father's unique property: Being unbegotten.

Biblical Evidence

  • John 16: Indicates the Holy Spirit receives from the Son.
    • Knowledge and spiration imply more than economic proceedings.
  • Revelation 22:1: River of Water of Life (Holy Spirit) proceeds from the throne of God and the Lamb.

Church Fathers

  • St. Augustine: Advocated that the Spirit proceeds from both Father and Son.
    • Identified hearing and knowledge from the Son as spiration.
  • St. Athanasius: Supported the filioque through scriptural interpretation.
  • St. Ambrose, St. Isidore, St. Epiphanius: All supported dual procession in various writings.

Theological Objections and Clarifications

  • Monarchy of the Father: Catholic position maintains the Father as the sole source of deity.
  • Subordination Argument: Shared spiration does not imply the Holy Spirit is lesser.
  • Essence-Energy Distinction: Critiqued as leading to a composite God or denying divinity to energies.

Conclusion

  • The Filioque is a substantial theological distinction between Catholicism and Eastern Orthodoxy.
  • Catholic dogma is that the Holy Spirit eternally proceeds from the Father and the Son, maintaining the monarchy of the Father while acknowledging a shared spiration.
  • The debate is not merely semantic but has implications for understanding the Trinity's internal life and economic missions.