Catholic Argument: The Holy Spirit's reception of essence and being from both Father and Son indicates a shared spiration.
Theological Arguments
Father and Son Spiration
The Father gives all to the Son except paternity.
The Father spirates, therefore the Son spirates.
Scriptural Basis: John 16: All that the Father has is mine.
Relation of Persons
Distinction in the Trinity based on relations of opposition.
Father's unique property: Being unbegotten.
Biblical Evidence
John 16: Indicates the Holy Spirit receives from the Son.
Knowledge and spiration imply more than economic proceedings.
Revelation 22:1: River of Water of Life (Holy Spirit) proceeds from the throne of God and the Lamb.
Church Fathers
St. Augustine: Advocated that the Spirit proceeds from both Father and Son.
Identified hearing and knowledge from the Son as spiration.
St. Athanasius: Supported the filioque through scriptural interpretation.
St. Ambrose, St. Isidore, St. Epiphanius: All supported dual procession in various writings.
Theological Objections and Clarifications
Monarchy of the Father: Catholic position maintains the Father as the sole source of deity.
Subordination Argument: Shared spiration does not imply the Holy Spirit is lesser.
Essence-Energy Distinction: Critiqued as leading to a composite God or denying divinity to energies.
Conclusion
The Filioque is a substantial theological distinction between Catholicism and Eastern Orthodoxy.
Catholic dogma is that the Holy Spirit eternally proceeds from the Father and the Son, maintaining the monarchy of the Father while acknowledging a shared spiration.
The debate is not merely semantic but has implications for understanding the Trinity's internal life and economic missions.