✝️

Understanding the Filioque Debate

Nov 29, 2024

Lecture on Eastern Orthodox and the Filioque

Historical Context

  • Year: 1264
  • Pope Urban IV
    • Former Patriarch of Jerusalem
    • Aimed to reunite the Greek and Latin churches
  • Philistines: Obstacle to church reunion
  • Nicene Creed Differences
    • Greek: "We believe in the Holy Spirit, the Lord, the giver of life."
    • Latin: "We believe in the Holy Spirit, the Lord, the giver of life, who proceeds from the Father and the Son."
    • The phrase "and the Son," or Filioque, is a major doctrinal difference.

Historical Debates

  • Debates date back to 8th century, causing schisms in the 9th century.
  • Great Schism in the 11th century.
  • Discussed in the 13th and 15th century reunion councils.

St. Thomas Aquinas' Role

  • Pope Urban IV's Request
    • Asked Aquinas to respond to Nicholas of Croatoan's work, Libelus.
  • Against the Error of the Greeks
    • Aquinas aimed to show the genuine sense of sources quoted by Nicholas of Croatoan.
    • Argued against Nicholas's thesis that differences were purely nominal.

Aquinas' Theological Argument for the Filioque

  • Relative Opposition
    • Designates a relation excluding the identity of subjects (e.g., Fatherhood and Sonship).
    • Different from relations like brotherhood and friendship, which can exist without distinct subjects.
  • Two Modes of Predication
    • Absolute: Essential to the Trinity (e.g., loving, just, wise).
    • Relative: Order to another, coming from procession (e.g., Father, Son, Spirit).
    • Agreed upon by both Eastern and Western Fathers.

Distinctions in the Trinity

  • Persons are consubstantial and distinguished by what is relative, not absolute.
  • Father and Son: Father is the Father of the Son.
  • Father and Spirit: Spirit is the Spirit of the Father.
  • Son and Spirit Distinction:
    • Must be a relation of procession to avoid infinite regress.

St. Thomas's Argument

  • Procession and Distinction
    • Real distinction requires relative opposition, implying procession.
    • Distinction between Son and Spirit must include procession.
  • Five Points of the Argument
    1. Real distinction necessitates relative opposition.
    2. Relative opposition implies a relation.
    3. Relation presupposes procession.
    4. Procession requires Son as the principle of the Spirit or vice versa.
    5. Accepted thesis: Son is the principle of the Spirit (Filioque).

References to St. Thomas's Works

  • Listed eight instances where Aquinas discusses the Filioque, including Summa Theologiae and De Potentia.

Conclusion

  • Foundational principles of Trinitarian theology lead to the Filioque.
  • These are not merely Latin principles but are admitted by Fathers of both East and West.
  • Filioque is necessary for the theological distinction between the Son and the Spirit.