Coconote
AI notes
AI voice & video notes
Try for free
✝️
Understanding the Filioque Debate
Nov 29, 2024
Lecture on Eastern Orthodox and the Filioque
Historical Context
Year:
1264
Pope Urban IV
Former Patriarch of Jerusalem
Aimed to reunite the Greek and Latin churches
Philistines:
Obstacle to church reunion
Nicene Creed Differences
Greek: "We believe in the Holy Spirit, the Lord, the giver of life."
Latin: "We believe in the Holy Spirit, the Lord, the giver of life, who proceeds from the Father and the Son."
The phrase "and the Son," or
Filioque
, is a major doctrinal difference.
Historical Debates
Debates date back to 8th century, causing schisms in the 9th century.
Great Schism in the 11th century.
Discussed in the 13th and 15th century reunion councils.
St. Thomas Aquinas' Role
Pope Urban IV's Request
Asked Aquinas to respond to Nicholas of Croatoan's work,
Libelus
.
Against the Error of the Greeks
Aquinas aimed to show the genuine sense of sources quoted by Nicholas of Croatoan.
Argued against Nicholas's thesis that differences were purely nominal.
Aquinas' Theological Argument for the Filioque
Relative Opposition
Designates a relation excluding the identity of subjects (e.g., Fatherhood and Sonship).
Different from relations like brotherhood and friendship, which can exist without distinct subjects.
Two Modes of Predication
Absolute:
Essential to the Trinity (e.g., loving, just, wise).
Relative:
Order to another, coming from procession (e.g., Father, Son, Spirit).
Agreed upon by both Eastern and Western Fathers.
Distinctions in the Trinity
Persons are consubstantial and distinguished by what is relative, not absolute.
Father and Son:
Father is the Father of the Son.
Father and Spirit:
Spirit is the Spirit of the Father.
Son and Spirit Distinction:
Must be a relation of procession to avoid infinite regress.
St. Thomas's Argument
Procession and Distinction
Real distinction requires relative opposition, implying procession.
Distinction between Son and Spirit must include procession.
Five Points of the Argument
Real distinction necessitates relative opposition.
Relative opposition implies a relation.
Relation presupposes procession.
Procession requires Son as the principle of the Spirit or vice versa.
Accepted thesis: Son is the principle of the Spirit (Filioque).
References to St. Thomas's Works
Listed eight instances where Aquinas discusses the Filioque, including
Summa Theologiae
and
De Potentia
.
Conclusion
Foundational principles of Trinitarian theology lead to the Filioque.
These are not merely Latin principles but are admitted by Fathers of both East and West.
Filioque is necessary for the theological distinction between the Son and the Spirit.
📄
Full transcript