Hey everybody, Dr. G here. I'm a clinical and forensic psychologist as well as a body language expert. And today we're going to be analyzing behavior and body language to see if we can determine whether or not there is actually an Epstein client list. Before we get started with this, couple of quick things. One, I wanted to make sure you know this is not a psychological evaluation of any kind. These are just my opinions. In addition to that, I do want to remind you to like and subscribe if you want to see more content just like this. All right, let's go. We're gonna be looking at three different clips today. Starting with an interview with Attorney General Pam Bondi. This is from February of this year. Then we're going to be looking at White House press secretary Caroline Levit. And then after that, we are going to be looking at President Trump and Pam Bondi together. All right, let's just jump right in about the DOJ may be releasing the list of Jeffrey Epstein's clients. Will that really happen? It's sitting on my desk right now to review. Um that's been a directive um by President Trump. I'm reviewing that. I'm reviewing JFK files, MLK files. Now, normally I break things down as we go, but I wanted you to see that whole clip. And now we're going to go back and break it down bit by bit. Donald Trump has talked about the DOJ may be releasing the list of Jeffrey Epstein's clients immediately. Now he specifically said releasing a list of Jeffrey Epstein's clients. That is specifically what was said. You saw her nodding her head as that was stated. There was nothing about files, nothing more broad than that. That was a very specific question and she had a very specific headnodding response to that which obviously anybody would interpret as affirmative as yes talked about the DOJ may be releasing the list of Jeffrey Epstein's clients. Will that really happen? It's sitting on my desk right now. Now this part right here is a little bit more ambiguous. So after he said, "Is that really going to happen?" The first thing you saw was her head doing this. Now, the challenge here is that sometimes people do shake their head for emphasis. And you see her do that in a way that appears to be emphasis after this. This is a little bit ambiguous, and I do like to be very specific about what I'm seeing. And if you look, her head is very horizontally moving like this. To me, that looks like a headshake. It looks like she's saying no, but that is potentially up for interpretation. Let's watch that again, and then we're going to keep going. Of Jeffrey Epstein's clients. Will that really happen? It's sitting on my desk right now to review. Um, that's been a directive. Um, so it's sitting on my desk right now for review. You saw the head nod with that. And now you see her doing this. Now, as she's doing this, this looks more like for emphasis than this did. Um, that's been a directive um by President Trump. I'm reviewing that. I'm reviewing JFK files, MLK files. And you see the way she's leaning in JFK files, MLK files. All of this seems very authentic. So when she said she has the file on her desk, there's nothing in her body language that would suggest that that is not true. Now whether or not she plans to release it or thinks it will ever actually get released, that's a little bit more ambiguous to me, but it seems very clear that she is telling the truth and she is being very specific when she is responding to whether or not there is an Epstein list on her desk. On top of that, she is someone who speaks very precisely. You're going to see that later and I get later she's trying to clarify this point, but she is someone who is very precise with her language. So, I would be very surprised if somebody said something that was inaccurate and she didn't correct them at that time. That's very much the way that she typically is. Um, by President Trump. I'm reviewing that. I'm reviewing JFK files, MLK files. That's all in the process of being reviewed because that was done at the directive of the president from all of these agencies. So, so have you seen any So, this was several months ago. Now, what we're going to be looking at is White House press secretary Carolyn Lovevet responding to questions the day after the Department of Justice came out and said there is no Epstein list. One of the main reasons I created this channel is to help people stay safe. Whether it's through recognizing body language or just understanding the warning signs of danger in today's digital age, your personal information could be at risk, leaving you vulnerable to scams, identity theft, and fraud. That's why I'm excited to share today's sponsor, Aura. Ara is an all-in-one digital safety solution that helps protect you and your family from data breaches, fraud, and identity theft. Here's the reality. The less personal information you have online, the safer you are. Aura helps remove your data from those shady broker websites that sell it to scammers. They monitor the dark web for your information, alert you to potential threats, and even allow you to lock your credit file with just a tap. Their features are designed to stop problems before they happen. AR also comes with militarygrade encryption to secure your online activity and a password manager to keep your login safe. And with $1 million in identity theft insurance per adult on your account, up to five people can be protected. It is an incredible layer of security for your entire family. As someone who's passionate about safety, I believe in taking every step to protect yourself physically and digitally. Don't wait until something happens. So, go to aura.com/drg and start your 14-day free trial today and see if your data has already been leaked. Take charge of your digital safety today. Thanks to Aura for sponsoring this video. Caroline, the DOJ and FBI have now concluded there was no Jeffrey Epstein client list. What do you tell MAGA supporters who say they want anyone involved in Jeffrey Epstein's alleged crimes to be held accountable? This administration wants anyone who has ever committed a crime to be held accountable. And I would argue this administration has done more to lock up bad guys than certainly the previous. All right, let's look at what her body language is doing right now. Held accountable. This administration wants anyone who has ever committed a crime to be held accountable. And I would argue this administ. She's being very emphatic. She's being very direct, but she's not addressing specifically what was asked. And this is something that she doesn't always do. She is someone who is very direct. She tends to respond to questions directly. But as you can hear right now, she is deflecting a lot and she's using a lot of emphasis as she's deflecting to make sure you pay attention to exactly what she's saying, not what you're asking. Has done more to lock up bad guys than certainly the previous administration. And so, as you can see, she raised her eyebrows, certainly more than the previous administration. So, rather than focusing on, hey, the Department of Justice has done an amazing job. We know for sure this is all all good. This is all right. She's deflecting once again, we're better than the last administration was. That's the that's the message right here. And once again, it's it's deflecting what people are really asking about. Done more to lock up bad guys than certainly the previous administration. And the Trump administration is committed to truth and to transparency. That's why the attorney general and the FBI director. Now, look at her body right here. As she's saying all of this, she's moving around a lot. And she, once again, is somebody who's very direct. It seems like it takes a lot to rattle her. And it seems like right now you're seeing more nervous energy than usual. She is not able to stand stand very still. You're seeing her scoot around, which probably means there's a lot of adrenaline going on. That probably means there's a lot of feeling as she's having to feel these questions. Probably much easier to respond to the previous questions during this. Committed to truth and to transparency. That's why the attorney general and the FBI director uh pledged to do an exhaustive review of all of the files related to Jeffrey Epstein's crimes and his death. And they put out a memo in conclusion of that. Sorry. They put out a memo. Watch your hands right here. To Jeffrey Epstein's crimes and his death and they put out a So, she wants you to pay attention to the memo. She doesn't want you to ask her questions. They put out a memo. That's the end of it. So, she's essentially kicking the can to somebody else. Memo in conclusion of that review. There was material they did not release because frankly it was incredibly graphic and it contained not something that's appropriate for public. Now, you can hear the pressure in her voice as she's talking about this. So, she's talking about that they're not going to release the type of content that they ultimately have, which nobody would expect them to. Nobody has asked for that. Not one person in all of this has ever asked for them to release anything other than the pe the names of the people that were involved because that's what was promised. So, as she's getting aggressive with this, that's a way to shut people down, to say, "We're not going to release that. That's not appropriate." But nobody's asking for that. So, it once again, it deflects exactly what everybody's wanting. And it's a way to shame and stop people from asking for the client list, even though what she's saying is actually entirely unrelated. Consumption. Um, but they committed to an exhaustive investigation. That's what they did. And now, this was the most interesting part of this whole thing. Watch her mouth right here. Um, but they committed to an exhaustive investigation. There's two important parts here. One is that she's looking down right now. That's when you don't really want to see the response of the person you're talking to. You may be saying something that you don't believe or saying something where you really just don't want to see how they're going to react, even if it's brief. And you also see this kind of frown. This is a way of being both uncomfortable and a way of showing indifference. It seems to be she's saying, "Well, they decided to do this." So, you see that this is maybe her real reaction. While she is very good at staying on target with what she's talking about, I'm not entirely sure personally if she actually believes what she's saying. I do I don't think that she's been given different information and said, "Hey, lie with these lie about this stuff." I think she's saying exactly what she has been given to say. I'm just not sure that she actually believes it for public consumption. Um, but they committed to an exhaustive investigation. That's what they did and they provided the results of that. That's transparency. Follow Caroline. Okay. So, as this next question is being asked, you see her back up a little bit. We do that to gain emotional distance because this is probably making her uncomfortable. Watch this right here. The results of that. That's transparency. Oh, Caroline. Okay. You can see the head bouncing back a little bit. There's discomfort with this. So, the FBI looks at the circuit. You can also see she's taking in a big breath through her nose. You can see the chest rays. She is appearing once again more uncomfortable than she typically does during these White House press briefings. That's transparency. Follow. Caroline. Okay. So, the FBI looks at the circumstances surrounding the death of Jeffrey Jeffrey Epstein. According to the report, this systematic review revealed no incriminating client list. So, what happened to the Epstein client list that the attorney general said she had on her desk? Well, I think if you go back and look at what the attorney general said in that interview, which was on your network on Fox News, quote, you saw her lips pucker right there. That's both stress and uncertainty. General said in that interview which was on your network on Fox News quote Roberts said DOJ may be releasing the list of Jeffrey Epstein's clients. Will that really happen? And she said it's sitting on my desk right now to review. Yes. She was saying the entirety of all of the paperwork, all of the paper in relation to Jeffrey Epstein's. So you can see her using emphasis to try to once again deflect the question. Watch this right now. entirety of all of so she's trying to illustrate. So pay attention to my hands. Pay attention to the fact that she has all this paperwork. That's what she's trying to illustrate. Don't pay attention to the question you just asked. Pay attention to what I'm saying. All of the paperwork, all of the paper in relation to Jeffrey Epstein's crimes. That's what the attorney and she even just she didn't even pronounce Epstein's name correct correctly. You'll hear she said Epste. Now, we're all allowed to say things wrong. I do it all the time. But it has to do with the fact that I think that this is causing her to feel more nervous than she typically does because she is not speaking as fluidly. She is messing up a little bit more than she than she usually does when she does these kinds of press briefings. The paperwork, all of the paper in relation to Jeffrey Epstein's crimes. That's what the attorney general was referring to, and I'll let her speak for that. But again, when it comes to the FBI and the Department of Justice, um they are more than committed to ensuring that bad people are put behind bars. Um they have an operation going on right now called Summer Heat. Um which has our murder rate trending in the lowest direction in United States history. Their emphasis on violent crime and locking up violent criminals. When she's talking about things that are not specifically related to this Epstein issue, she gets louder because once again, if she speaks loudly, she thinks that will be what people hear. Has led to the arrest of 14,000 violent criminals. That's a 62% increase from the same time period last year. So, this attorney general and the FBI director are committed to putting bad people behind bars where they belong. That they promised an exhaustive review. That's what they did. For any further details, I would refer you to the Department of Justice. Uh, thanks Caroline. With Prime Minister Netanyahu visiting the White House today, after she finished that, you saw her licking her lips. There's probably a lot of relief that that is over and now she's moving on. Now, we're going to move on to a clip of both Pam Bondi and President Trump. Your memo and release. You can already see the look of disapproval on President Trump's mouth when he purses his lips together in this way. That is a distinct look of disapproval. Your memo and release yesterday on Jeffrey Epstein, it left some lingering mysteries. One of the biggest ones is whether he ever worked for a American or foreign intelligence agency. Um the former labor second. That was a look of confusion. You saw her mouth close, her head shake. She was not anticipating they were going to ask about that. There's so many other questions people are concerned about. the client list, all of that kind of stuff. So, the idea that he asked about him working for a foreign intellig intelligence agency threw her through a loop for a American or foreign intelligence agency. Um, the former labor secretary who was Miami US attorney um Alex Costiki allegedly said that he did work for an intelligence agency. So, could you res You can see she's nodding along with this. She does want to make sure that the reporter feels heard. So part of that is she is trying to connect right now because I do think she wants to address this. She wants to get these things out of the way dissolve whether or not he did and also could you say why there was a minute missing? I think if anybody has already seen this knows that he is getting ready to talk but you're seeing some precursor to that. You're seeing him prepare for that agency. So could you resolve whether or not he did and also could you say why there was a minute missing from the jail house tape on the United States? Yeah sure. Could I just interrupt for a second? Are you still talking about? So, you can see Pam Bondi, she brushed her hair behind her ear after that. We do that to ventilate a little bit when we're starting to feel anxious. Even though she doesn't have an overt sign of anxiety, even though she's nodding, she looks like she's keyed in. There's little things like that that suggest that this is a highstakes intense situation. Yeah, sure. If could I just interrupt a second? Are you still talking about Jeffrey Epstein? This guy's been talked about for years. you're asking. We have Texas, we have this, we have all. So, watch President Trump's hands right here. All right. So, he's got his hands up like this. Now, in some ways, sometimes when people do this, it's a way to say stop. It's also a way to say, look, I haven't done anything wrong. And I don't mean that as in he hasn't done anything related to the Epstein situation. He's trying to say, I made the right decisions here. Like, I'm the one who's in charge. I've made the right decisions. Whatever the DOJ has come to, we need to move on. Are you still talking about Jeffrey Epstein? And his body language right here is actually very open. So, I know there's a lot of theories about why they think that President Trump is is wanting to to keep this suppressed or something like that. I don't think, just to be clear from the body language we're seeing that it's anything like that he's that he's afraid of being exposed for something. I think that it's more that he's afraid that people will see it as a failure on his part. That his administration did something that is incredibly unpopular with everybody regardless of which side of the political spectrum they're on. This is gravely unpopular what has happened here. This guy's been talked about for years. You're asking we have Texas, we have this, we have all of the things and are people still talking about this guy? So once again, this is an odd deflection because people don't really care about Jeffrey Epstein. They care about the fact that they believe there are other people that are involved that are roaming free. So that it's it's a strange deflection and I'm sure that President Trump knows what people are actually concerned about. So why he's choosing to try to sort of guilt people into thinking about or talking about this right now or to not talk about these things right now because of what's going on in Texas and all of that, which is incredibly important. It's it's an incredibly strange and different type of deflection than he normally does. Creep. That is unbelievable. Do you want to waste the time and do you feel like answering? I I don't mind answering. I mean, I can't believe you're asking a question on Epstein at a time like this. See, he's using the hands for emphasis. I can't believe you're asking a question. And he's someone who focuses a lot on relationships. He focuses on the person that's sitting in front of him. So he is going to want the journalist to not want to ask questions like that again. But we're having some of the greatest success and and also tragedy with what happened in Texas. It just seems uh like a desecration. But you go ahead. Sure. Sure. First to back up on that, in February I did an interview on Fox and it's been getting a lot of attention because I said I was asked a question about the client list and my response. So the first you saw the air quotes when it came to client list as though this is something that doesn't exist. I said I was asked a question about the client list and my response was it's sitting on my desk to be reviewed meaning the file along with the JFK MLK files as well that now she's someone who is very I said this earlier she's someone who's very precise when she speaks. So the idea that she would have misspoken or that's not what she meant seems unusual. It would be very surprising that it would be taking her this long to clarify that point. That's what I meant by that. The file along see when she said the file that makes me a little bit concerned that there's something deceptive about the way that she's saying that she's closing her eyes. She says file and consciously we're doing that so we don't have to look at the person when we say it. sitting on my desk to be reviewed. Meaning the file along with the JFK MLK files as well. That's what I meant by that. Also to the tens of thousands of video, they turned out to downloaded by that disgusting Jeffrey. So once again, she's using the same line that Caroline Levit did, which is that we're not going to share. We don't want people to see this awful evidence. Nobody's asking. Nobody would want to see that. It has nothing to do with anything that's upsetting anybody. They were never going to be released. Never going to see the light of day. See, never going to be released. He's saying this aggressively. Focus on what I'm saying right here. This is the message I want you to get when it's immaterial because nobody cares about that. That has nothing to do with anything anybody's ever asked for. To him being an agent, I have no knowledge about that. We can get back to you on that. And the minute missing from the video, so when she says that, I have no knowledge of that. Watch this. to him being an agent. I have no knowledge about that. We can get back to you. I have no knowledge about that. We can get back to that. I actually think that's true. Whether or not she believes it or thinks maybe there's something to that, she does not have information on that. I I don't think on that and the minute missing from the video, we release the video showing definitively the video was not conclusive. So, look at the way she's emphasizing this now. She wasn't moving her hands that much, but now she's really talking about this minute missing. She's looking over at President Trump and Marco Rubio. She is really trying to emphasize this. And I think that she means this. Whether or not you think that's why that minute was cut out. I'm sure plenty of people have their own theories about that, but this is something she believes. She believes that this minute is not cut out for any sort of nefarious reason. She actually does believe that this minute is cut out because that's the way that the software works. We're going to get into that. We're going to see in a second. But as she's looking around at everybody, this is the first time she's trying to connect with other people cuz she's trying to say, "Look, this is true. This is really something that's happened." Showing definitively the video was not conclusive, but the evidence prior to it was and she just said the video was not conclusive, which is fascinates me. So, in other words, they're saying that there's nothing on the video that's conclusive about what happened to him. But I thought they said that the whole video did prove exactly what at least Dan Bonino had said the video is going to prove our point. The quality is not great, but it proves it. She's saying the video is inconclusive of showing definitively the video was not conclusive, but the evidence prior to it was showing he committed. And what was on that? There was a minute that was off the counter. And what we learned from Bureau of Prisons was every year, every um night they redo that. See, look how much more animated she is when she's talking about this because this is something that I think she actually fully believes. That video is old from like 1999. So, every night the video is reset and every night should have the same minute missing. So, we're looking for that video to release that as well, showing that a minute is missing every night. And that's it on Epstein. And then the smile at the end. We oftentimes do that as a way to punctuate what we're saying to say, I'm not answering anything else about this. Let's stop. Now, hopefully this has helped you better understand some of the behavior and body language that we saw. So, to answer the question, is there an Epstein list? Well, based on the body language, it certainly seems likely that there probably is. Based on what she said at the beginning, it seemed very affirmative that there was a list sitting on her desk. It also seemed like later on we're seeing people that are showing signs that maybe they are not being entirely forthcoming. Do I think that there's a list? I think that there probably is. Do I think that based on that first clip that Pam Bondi knew that that list would never be released? That seems very possible. Like I said, that's the most ambiguous thing out of all of these clips that we saw. But basically what we're seeing at least more currently when we look at Caroline Levit, President Trump, and more recently Pam Bondi, it looks like they are trying to deflect what people's concerns are. They're not they're talking about bringing people to justice and they're talking about the awful content that has been collected, but nobody is asking them to release anything like that. And that's really what they're emphasizing. So if you have anything else you want me to analyze or there's anything else you want me to look at, please let me know in the comments below. Last thing before we get finished up is I do want to remind you to like and subscribe if you want to see more content just like this.