⚖️

International Shoe Case Summary

Sep 5, 2025

Overview

This lecture covers the Supreme Court case International Shoe Co. v. Washington and the development of specific in personam jurisdiction in U.S. civil procedure.

International Shoe Co. v. Washington

  • International Shoe was a Delaware corporation with headquarters in Missouri, selling shoes in Washington through salesmen.
  • Washington sued International Shoe for unpaid unemployment taxes.
  • International Shoe argued that state courts lacked personal jurisdiction because it had no physical presence in Washington.
  • The Supreme Court held that "minimum contacts" with the forum state can establish personal jurisdiction.
  • The company had sufficient contacts through its salesmen to be subject to Washington's jurisdiction.

Specific In Personam Jurisdiction

  • In personam jurisdiction refers to a court's power over an individual or entity.
  • Specific jurisdiction applies when the lawsuit arises out of or relates to the defendant’s activities in the forum state.
  • The court must find minimum contacts that make jurisdiction reasonable and fair ("traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice").
  • The contacts must be purposeful, meaning the defendant targeted or benefited from the forum state.

Effects of the International Shoe Ruling

  • Shifted analysis from physical presence to minimum contacts for personal jurisdiction.
  • Enabled states to assert jurisdiction over out-of-state businesses with significant in-state business activities.
  • Laid the foundation for modern personal jurisdiction doctrine, especially in cases involving interstate commerce.

Key Terms & Definitions

  • Personal Jurisdiction — a court's authority over the parties involved in the lawsuit.
  • In Personam Jurisdiction — jurisdiction over the person or entity, as opposed to property.
  • Specific Jurisdiction — jurisdiction based on claims arising from the defendant’s activities in the forum state.
  • Minimum Contacts — sufficient connections between the defendant and the forum state to justify jurisdiction.
  • Fair Play and Substantial Justice — due process standard ensuring jurisdiction is reasonable and just.

Action Items / Next Steps

  • Review the facts and holding of International Shoe Co. v. Washington.
  • Read assigned textbook sections on personal jurisdiction and minimum contacts.
  • Prepare examples of minimum contacts for class discussion.