Syntax: Understanding C-Command and Government
Introduction
- Presented by Andrew Carney, Professor of Linguistics at the University of Arizona.
- Focus on tree structures in syntax, particularly relationships between nodes.
- Precedence (left-right) and Dominance (up-down) relationships in trees previously defined.
- Introduction of structural prominence without reliance on dominance.
C-Command
- Definition: Relationship where a node is higher in prominence without direct dominance.
- Occurs between a node, its sister, and all daughters and granddaughters of its sister.
- Example: In a tree, node A c-commands its sister C and all of Cās daughters (D, E, F, G, H).
- Non-mutual C-command: If A c-commands D, D does not necessarily c-command A.
Formal Definition
Types of C-Command
- Symmetric C-Command: Mutual c-command between nodes.
- Example: A and B symmetrically c-command each other.
- Asymmetric C-Command: Non-mutual c-command.
- Example: A asymmetrically c-commands D, E, F, G, H.
Government
- Definition: Local c-command, traditionally termed as government.
- Based on no intervening nodes between c-commanding nodes.
- Relationship: A node governs another if it c-commands it without an intervener.
- Example: Immediate precedence/dominance analogy.
Examples and Nuances
- Interveners:
- If A, G, and B are heads, A governs G and G governs B, but A doesn't govern B due to Gās intervention.
- Categories of nodes (e.g., head vs. phrase) alter governing relationships.
Historical Context
- Usage: Once popular in the late 1980s and early 90s as a mechanism for licensing relationships.
- Current Relevance: Rarely used in modern syntax but essential for understanding older literature.
Remember, these concepts are crucial for understanding how elements in a sentence are related beyond direct dominance and precedence, and help in analyzing sentence structure in syntax.