Lecture Notes: Federalist Paper No. 78
Main Focus
- Discussion on Federalist No. 78, authored by Alexander Hamilton.
- Focus on the judicial branch and its role within the federal government.
Key Ideas
-
Life Terms for Federal Judges
- Federal judges should be appointed for life.
- Life tenure is meant to ensure an independent judiciary.
-
Independent Judiciary
- Independence necessary to prevent influence from other branches.
- Judges are appointed, not elected, to maintain impartiality.
- Life tenure ensures judges can make decisions without fear of repercussions from Congress or the President.
-
Power of Judicial Review
- Judiciary must have the power to review and potentially void laws.
- Purpose is to protect the Constitution from legislative overreach.
Arguments Presented by Hamilton
-
Judicial Tenure
- Judges appointed "during good behavior"; no fixed term limits like other officials.
- Life tenure seen as a way to maintain "steady, upright, and impartial administration of the laws."
-
Judiciary as the Least Dangerous Branch
- Judiciary lacks "power of the purse" (budget control) and "power of the sword" (military power).
- Relies on executive branch for enforcement of its rulings.
-
Importance of Independence
- Liberty at risk if judiciary is controlled by legislative or executive branches.
- Independence ensures judges defend the Constitution without bias.
-
Judicial Review as a Constitutional Safeguard
- Courts must have the ability to declare laws void if they contradict the Constitution.
- Described as the "bulwark" against legislative overreach.
- Constitution regarded as superior to any federal law.
Reflection
- The speaker encourages viewers to consider whether life terms for judges are beneficial or if a more democratic approach should be considered.
Additional Resources
- Encouragement to use the AP Gov Ultimate Review Packet for exam preparation.
Note: The content emphasizes the purpose and implications of life tenure and judicial review as mechanisms to uphold an independent judiciary and protect constitutional rights.