In this video, we are going to see Charlie Kirk go on a long, pointless rant when pressed on toxic masculinity. We're also going to see the crowd repeatedly laugh at Charlie Kirk because he's outsmarted by an Oxford student. As usual, let's watch the video in full and I'm going to give you guys my thoughts towards the end. Uh, hey Charlie. So, I wanted to return to a comment you made earlier um about Generation of Lost Boys. Um, you liken them to the Peter Pan movie. Oh, okay. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Um, so when we're talking about we're talking about Red Bull Media as being a large influence and I wanted to define that. Um, it's a reference to the matrix in which uh, a lot of these media heads kind Yeah. Yeah. talk about um, unplugging yourself. Um, and it's about waking up to the realization that um, you know, there is an active attack on masculinity that uh, men's rights need to be you know uh that men are being oppressed in a way and that men's rights need to be advocated for. Um and you know many people have attributed the red pill media to rise in like uh this almost generation of lost boys. I kind of wanted to get your opinion on kind of like do you see this generation of lost boys as a failure of like say masculinity or are there potential other factors economic social factors such as you know the death of the American dream uh increasing costs of uh living in America increased cost of education are there like any other reasons as to why this generation of lost boys might exist or do you basically I acknowledge all of that of course one of them it's a very good faith question and thank you um in America America. We made a stupid decision in the 1970s, '8s, and 90s to shut down our factories in the middle part of the country and basically disenfranchise and de-industrialize tens of millions of working-class men and tell them to go move to the cities and learn to code. I said this in the previous Q&A, but I I can again um which is that men you a family used to be able to be supported on a single income of 35 weeks of labor a year. Now it takes upwards of 60 weeks of labor a year. However, given all the economic and social and all those factors, the largest of all of them is the cultural and the educational that has infantilized men and hyper feminized them in the messaging, in the outreach and in the treatment. And so, I can give you specific examples. Yeah. In what way has the education system infantilized men? I mean, every possible way. from the hypermedication of young men from in the core curriculum in America. We learn about toxic masculinity from ages eight in public schools in California and in New York. We never talk about toxic femininity. Do you agree that there's toxic femininity as well? I mean, I think it's an unfair double standard. Why? How can femininity not be tox toxic masculinity? Can I'm not saying they can't be. I think Do we teach kids about toxic femininity in our school? No. Tell me. Yes or no? I mean, I think that they come from two very different places. is I think toxic masculinity comes from a a level of misogyny where I think toxic femininity often comes from a reaction to a misogynistic system uh which fundamentally oppresses and systematically oppresses women. And I'm not saying that toxic femininity is a good thing, but I'm saying it's a much more understood and valid reaction to a system of oppression versus toxic masculinity which oppresses. Okay. Um, so even if I grant you that, even if I grant you that, are they teaching toxic? Is that term ever been used in a school that you know of? What? What term? Toxic femininity. Um, no, it's not. Oh, that's weird. So only one sex gets criticized and called toxic. Maybe that creates a backlash. Well, because one is creating a system of oppression. No, that's your interpretation. No, you can make every excuse under the book that you'd like, but only one chromosome set gets criticized, called that they're terrible and awful, and that women basically need to be like go go go into the in the corporate world with no reservation. And young men see this pattern in the west and in our country from the authors, from the curriculum, from the music, from the movies. And we see and of course again in the educational system proper we have seen the infantilization of the young male. And so it it's just again we we know the data you did agree to it that young men are checking out completely but we're actually living under a hyper feminist west that is toxic. What does that mean? Speech police feelings first emotionals emotion over reason community over individualism. We're seeing this. And by the way is it working? Is the West stronger as it's become more feminine the last 30 years? No. In fact, our morale is weaker. We're more suicidal. Our fertility rates are down. We have lost the balance. We've lost the ying and the yang between the male and the female. We lost what worked and we have hyperplatformed. Your own prime minister, Boris Johnson, when he was talking at a summit said, "We need to actually make things more feminine." Could you imagine if he said, "We need to make things more masculine." How does that sound to a dock worker in Brighton or someone in Essex? We need to make things more feminine. No, instead we need we need to restore the balance that God created men and women and right now they're in. By the way, you want example? Adolescence. How does that movie adolescence not broadly generalize a theme that first of all doesn't exist? Secondly is like a a slow motion um like humiliation ritual for the young boys of Britain. Could you imagine if there was a similar movie uh criticizing young women uh that are like how they are the ones that are driving men away about how catty they are about how they don't want to be No, it's fine. I'm just I'll just complete the point. I could give you data point after data point and I would ask you the question, has the West grown stronger the more epheminite has become? Okay. Um, you've said a lot. Um, yes, that's how a Q&A works. You ask the question, I answer. So, I am the speaker. You know, that's how it works. Thank you. Um, okay. So, on your point about adolescence, I don't think adolescence is a generalization. We are not saying that every young boy in the UK is like this. We're not saying every young boy goes through this process. It's an example of what can happen when people fall into this kind of media. I think it's like and it's it's more of a story or warning to what can happen to people that you know fall into these bubbles who don't find the help that they necessarily need that can turn violent. And like this is a perfect example of toxic masculinity in which the boy feels like he's not affirmed in his masculinity and takes that out on women like that. Uh we've also then seen like within men like the largest contributor to like men's deaths right now is male suicide like um but I would argue that is not a factor of feminization but instead a factor of masculinity. The idea that men can't be in touch with their feelings. You talked about feeling first approach being a feminina. So men are simply not allowed to engage with their feelings at all are like men not allowed to talk about their feelings. These are large contributors to a massive problem within men's spaces that lead to what is the highest contributor to men's death, suicide. And I think this idea that, you know, men simply go back to work and uh if they're economically assured, then suddenly everything is fine and, you know, men's mental health was never an issue before like the '9s when or whatever it was when we used to start affirming men's mental health. I think is an unfair um it's it's an unfair point to make and I think it doesn't speak to a lot of issues that a lot of young men face and I think it's a dishonest way to go about talking about this conversation. Okay. So, uh which part would you like me to respond to? Um let's go to the point about male suicide and masculinity not being to your point. If it was true that men have always been miserable, why have the suicide rates gone up? Well, because we've started recording suicides better. It's not to say that. It's not to say that suicides didn't occur on this level. It's just we simply have better ways of recording. That's rubbish. And you know, body bags are data that transcends any sort of manipulation. It a self-inflicted gun wound or being hung. It was not like a mass recording issue 60 years ago in this country or in the West. It is a material fact because we know it's happening in the Anglosphere. It's happening in Australia. It's happening in America. It's happening all across Europe. that suicide rates of men are going up. Depression is going up. They are correlated together. It's not a reporting issue. There's something undergirling it. And in fact, just one other thing, your own prime minister endorsed adolescence. He sent out a tweet saying, "I was shocked to the core when I watched this film and everyone should watch it." So that is an endorsement from the the top leader other than you know the king of this country of endor. I don't even know may the king endorse. I don't I mean an endorsement is not a generalization. Well, hold on. No, no. He said, "I'm troubled to the core of what this could become." And you have to all again, that is one example of thousands that I could give, one that is the most applicable to here to this country. And I guess I would just ask this question in closing. Do you think men would be happier if they are married and providing for a family? I don't think marriage or the institution of marriage is the only way a man can be happy. That's not what I said. I said generally happier. Do you think men will be generally happier if they're married, providing, and have children? I don't think that is I don't think that's a necessary factor to contributing this happiness. What then? What is your solution to bring about male happiness in the west? Mine is men get married, have children and provide. What is yours? It's a big question. Um I think an affirmation of their emotions, their emotional states. I think an openness um to allowing men to express themselves in whichever way they want, even if that is in a more affeminite way or a western typically a feminite way. I don't think it's about ostracization. I don't think it's about promoting one simple institution of living and uh disregarding all of those else. Men who are men are free to live single, men are free to be in gay relationships. I don't think like that's I don't think that the institution of marriage privileges one to a life of happiness over any other way of living. So of course you have the agency to do that. With all due respect, have you been to London the last 10 years? Men can do whatever they want. I live in London. Are they happier? Men can dress how they want. Men can act how they want and go to any club. Has it worked? Yeah, but also we've had austerity. There are other factors outside of simply just you see what you're doing respectfully. You you're you're scrambling for an excuse to get away from the truth that's right in front of you. Maybe men should get married and have children because it's worked for 2,000 years. I just think it's a very dishonest way to go about this argument that there's only one issue. Interesting. Can I challenge you on that though? Why is it that the men of much poorer African and Asian countries don't have suicide issues yet they have no money? How do we know that? Oh, we know again by a empirical third party reported data from the UN, from the US State Department, there is not a suicide crisis in subsaharan Africa. There's not a suicide crisis in in Southeast Asia with young men. So explain to me that phenomenon. They're materially wealthy. Not they're not materially wealthy and yet they're harming themselves. So why would you then say it's austerity? Sorry. Say that again. Okay. You're you're you're looking for another explanation for male unhappiness. I'm pointing to you to a part of the world that actually does value marriage and does have children, but they have no money. So therefore, how could you say it is a material problem why the men of London who can dress how they want, go to whatever bar they want, are not happy? because there's more than one reason. Like there are multiple factors. It's not just like it's not even just economic, there's economic, there's social, there's like like religious pressures. There's like there's so many like you cannot boil down a societal issue to like one. And I acknowledge that, right? I I even at the beginning remember I'm saying the biggest the one that has an exponent on it is that we have a biological urge that God gave us when he designed us, which is to be fruitful and multiply for men to provide for the family. And when we suppress that and we say that you can go live whatever lifestyle you would like as already happens in the west. We have exhibit A. We have we have a a serious suicide, mental health, anxiety, depression issues. So, I would just ask you to think over the next couple days, months, or years. Why is it that men in countries that barely have toilets and do not have two pounds to rub together, but they do have kids and they do have a wife, are much happier than someone with a big flat in downtown London. Something to think about. I mean, I I think happiness is a difficult idea to conflate in that sense. I mean, they're less likely to kill themselves. Forget all these happiness indexes. If you kill yourself, you're not happy, right? So these poor countries do not have male suicide problems. Why? I do not vote. Think about it. Thank you very [Applause] much. That was actually quite interesting back and forth. Um I literally feel the student on the on the right, he had Charlie in a bit of a choke hold for quite a while. Now, the last question, what it is that I would say is when you're debating someone like a Charlie Kirk, um, and you see this with Donald Trump, these people will just pull things out of the sky without any proof, without any, um, information or individuals to point at to say, "This is where I got this information from." You'll see that so many times. And I feel like that's what it is that Charlie K done at the end there to say in Africa or any um, third world countries and whatnot. not just Africa, any third world country at all to say that those types of places they don't have um in they don't have individuals who commit suicide or or suicide rates are high and whatnot. To say that without actually stating where did you get that information from, you know, if it was, you know, research data, well, who who conducted the research or the data? to say that without actually not stating where you got that information from. That's just a bit in, you know, disingenuous for me. And I can't take that information serious because I've seen a lot of people on the right, including a Charlie Kirk, just telling spread lies purely because of the fact that it helps the narrative and the argument that it is that they're making at that time. But as usual, you know, I want to hear your guys' thoughts and your guys' opinions on this back and forth between Charlie and this student. Um, I really think the student made some really, really good points. Had Charlie on the ropes for quite a bit. But let me know your guys' thoughts in the comments section down below. While you're down there, hit that subscribe button if you're brand new to the channel. Also, turn on the bell notification so that you will get notified every single time we upload a brand new video. And then also alongside that, do me a massive favor and hit the thumbs up button purely for the YouTube algorithm. Let's get this video in front of as many people as possible. I appreciate you guys and I will see you guys in the next one.