📉

8.4- Price Ceilings (Part 2)

Oct 16, 2024

Price Controls and Market Distortions

Overview

  • Price controls affect the signaling and incentive functions of prices.
  • They cause market distortions, misallocation, and shortages.

Laws Against Price Gouging

  • Common after natural disasters (e.g., hurricanes).
  • Governments often ban unconscionable price increases.
  • Demand for essential goods spikes (ice, food, generators, gasoline).

Market Dynamics Pre- and Post-Disaster

  • Before Hurricane:
    • Demand curve D0, supply curve, equilibrium at quantity Q0 and price P0.
  • After Hurricane:
    • Demand increases to D1.
    • In a free market, prices increase (to P1), signaling suppliers to bring in more goods.
    • Equilibrium quantity would shift to Q1.

Impact of Price Controls

  • Price Ceiling: Government sets ceiling at P0.
    • Quantity demanded increases to Q2.
    • Suppliers supply only Q0 due to inability to cover costs.
    • Results in a shortage: Q2 - Q0.
    • Misallocation occurs: Generators may not reach those with highest willingness to pay.

Consequences of Price Ceilings

  • Overconsumption and under-provision lead to shortages.
  • Deadweight loss.
  • Misallocation of resources.

Examples of Price Control Issues

  • Transportation: On busy nights (e.g., Saturday), unadjusted prices lead to ride shortages.
    • Increased demand with fixed prices results in cab shortages.
    • Misallocation: those less in need might get rides, while others willing to pay more cannot.
  • Free Parking:
    • Price ceiling of zero leads to high demand.
    • People pay with their time searching for spots.
    • Misallocation: those with lesser need might get spots over those with higher willingness to pay.

Conclusion

  • Price controls are a blunt instrument causing misallocation, long lines, and black markets.
  • They prevent productive exchanges at market-determined prices.
  • Often used because they appear to be an easy solution to managing high prices.
  • May reflect a lack of understanding or disregard for microeconomic principles by policymakers.