💼

Week 3, Video 3, Trademark Dilution Overview

Jun 6, 2025

Overview

This lecture covers trademark dilution, focusing on definitions, legal developments, key distinctions, and the requirements for proving dilution, as well as exceptions and class activity instructions.

Trademark Dilution: Definition and Concepts

  • Trademark dilution protects famous marks from uses that lessen their distinctiveness, even without confusion or competition.
  • Two main types: blurring (weakens uniqueness by free riding) and tarnishment (harms reputation through negative association).
  • Only owners of famous trademarks can bring dilution claims.

Legal Development: U.S. Law on Dilution

  • Trademark dilution originated in early legal theory and was federally codified in 1995 under the Federal Trademark Dilution Act (FTDA).
  • The FTDA was influenced by the TRIPS Agreement (Article 16) and state-level dilution laws.
  • A Supreme Court case (Moseley v. Victoria’s Secret) initially required proof of actual dilution, not just likelihood.
  • The 2006 Trademark Dilution Revision Act switched the standard to "likelihood of dilution."
  • The 2006 Act clarified definitions and added limitations and exceptions, such as fair use and comparative advertising.

Key Statutory Factors and Protections

  • Courts assess fame using factors like advertising reach, sales, and public recognition.
  • No official U.S. registry for famous marks; other countries may have one.
  • Blurring factors include similarity, exclusivity of use, and intent to associate.
  • Tarnishment is defined as harm to reputation via association with the famous mark.
  • The 2006 Act permits enforcement regardless of confusion or direct competition.

Limitations and Exceptions

  • Statutory exceptions include nominative and descriptive fair use, noncommercial use, and news reporting or commentary.
  • The Act aims to balance trademark protection with legitimate third-party uses.

Example and Class Activity

  • Class assignment involves analyzing a "Starbucks for dog services" scenario for possible infringement, dilution, or fair use.
  • Students should consider the presence or absence of confusion, dilution, and exceptions.

Key Terms & Definitions

  • Trademark Dilution — Use that weakens the distinctiveness or reputation of a famous mark, even without confusion or competition.
  • Blurring — Dilution through weakening of a mark’s uniqueness by association with unrelated products or services.
  • Tarnishment — Dilution by harming the reputation of a famous mark through negative associations.
  • Famous Mark — A trademark widely recognized by the general consuming public.
  • Fair Use — Legitimate use of a trademark in contexts like commentary, parody, or comparative advertising.

Action Items / Next Steps

  • Complete and submit the class activity analyzing the Starbucks scenario.
  • Participate in the online discussion and review related problem questions.
  • Prepare any assigned presentations, videos, or multiple-choice responses for this week.