Coconote
AI notes
AI voice & video notes
Try for free
🤔
Understanding Hume's Argument on Induction
Oct 28, 2024
Lecture Notes: Hume's Skeptical Argument Concerning Induction
Introduction
Speaker: Daniel Greco, Assistant Professor of Philosophy at Yale University.
Previous discussion: David Hume's distinction between relations of ideas and matters of fact.
Current discussion: Application of Hume's distinction to a skeptical argument concerning induction.
Knowing Matters of Fact
Observation as a way to know about matters of fact (e.g., observing the sun).
Challenge: Knowing unobserved matters of fact (e.g., future events, unseen animals).
General strategy:
Projection of observed regularities onto unobserved cases
(Induction).
Example: All observed fires are hot; assume unobserved fires are hot.
Induction
Definition: Inferring unobserved properties based on observed regularities.
Example of flawed induction: Hair color prediction (black hair now implies black hair forever).
Correct use of induction
:
Relies on general features (e.g., fires are hot, gravity operates).
Assumes the uniformity of nature:
Future will resemble the past
in general respects.
Laws of Nature
Argument: Laws of nature (e.g., gravity) derived from inductive reasoning.
Assumes uniformity of nature to predict future events.
Question: Why believe future will resemble past?
Not a relation of ideas; conceivable future could differ drastically (e.g., sun doesn't rise).
Inductive Argument
Circular nature: Using past to predict future assumes future resembles past.
Challenge: Why is induction better than other methods (e.g., magic 8-ball, astrology)?
Circular argument exists for both induction and other methods.
Hume's Skeptical Solution
No rational reason to prefer induction over other methods (e.g., crystal ball gazing).
Habitual reasoning
: Induction is a strong instinctive habit.
Like birds flying south, humans naturally reason inductively.
Justifying induction does not arise in practice due to ingrained habit.
Conclusion
Difficulty in disproving Hume's argument.
Continued philosophical exploration on the topic necessary.
Invitation for further study in subsequent discussions or videos.
📄
Full transcript