Scientifically Informed Insider Look at Mental Health: ICD vs DSM
Introduction
- Presentation by Dr. Grande
- Focus on differences between ICD (International Classification of Diseases) and DSM (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders)
Use and Purpose of Manuals
- Mental Disorder Definitions: Used for diagnostic purposes
- Classification Benefits: Aids treatment, understanding of causes, prevention, and progression (natural history) of disorders
Communication Among Practitioners
- Provides a common language for mental health professionals
- Facilitates faster and clearer communication (e.g., diagnosing bipolar disorder)
- Highlights challenge: Lack of biological markers for mental disorders unlike physical medicine
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM)
- History: First published in 1952, DSM-5 released in 2013
- Popularity: Widely used in the United States
- Structure: Operationalized definitions with criteria for disorders
- Inter-rater Reliability: High due to specific criteria
- Research Base: Extensive research available
- Usage Flexibility: Allows clinical discretion despite structured criteria
- Unique Disorders: Includes disorders not in ICD like disruptive mood dysregulation disorder
International Classification of Diseases (ICD)
- History: First edition in 1893, morbidity added in 1948, ICD-10 in 1990, ICD-11 in 2018
- Global Use: Used worldwide, less common in the U.S.
- Content: Covers all disorders, with specific section for mental health
- Diagnosis Approach: Utilizes guidelines instead of strict criteria, leaving more room for interpretation and clinical discretion
- Unique Disorders: Includes some diagnoses not in DSM like complex PTSD, gaming disorder, compulsive sexual behavior disorder
- Personality Disorders: One general diagnosis with ratings, unlike DSM’s categorical system
Key Differences
- Operationalization: DSM uses strict criteria; ICD uses broader guidelines
- Flexibility: ICD allows more clinical interpretation
- Information and Research: DSM provides more detailed information and has a strong research foundation
Preference and Practice
- Personal Preference: Dr. Grande prefers DSM for clarity and abundant research
- Counselor Training: Preference often stems from initial training and widespread usage
- Potential for Change: If DSM were to be replaced by ICD, minimal change expected in U.S. practices
Conclusion
- Both manuals are valuable tools for mental health diagnosis
- Dialogue and differing opinions enrich the understanding of ICD and DSM
- Future potential for merging the two manuals remains unlikely
Final Thoughts
- Engaging in community discussion encouraged for diverse perspectives on ICD and DSM
Dr. Grande emphasizes the importance of understanding these manuals to support effective mental health diagnosis and treatment.