Transcript for:
Impact of Brown v. Board of Education

by the early 50s segregation was frayed by the war and torn in spots where the court had acted the white primary was outlawed housing covenants outlawed some graduate and law schools were forced to admit blacks but the court was aware that the big fight was still to come the schools K through 12 white children and black in the same classroom southerners assumed that if grade school kids were in a desegregated setting they'd get to know each other and they get to date each other and then they'd married each other and that was the strongest taboo that the South held led by Thurgood Marshall and other young lawyers like Robert Carter the n-double-a-cp Legal Defense Fund was running or aiding cases all over the country the court picked five and consolidated them into one set of arguments forever known as Brown versus Board of Education of Topeka Kansas as oral arguments approached people camped outside the building to assure themselves a seat in courtroom n-double-a-cp lawyers Marshall and Carter were up against a formidable adversary John W Davis a former presidential candidate making the last of his 140 appearances at the Supreme Court but his arguments had a familiar ring separate wasn't necessarily unequal blacks should be happy with the way things were didn't states have the right to educate their children as they saw fit when the three days of arguments were over Davis was heard to remark I think we've got it one five two four or maybe six two three the justices scheduled another hearing on the case but before that could happen Chief Justice Vinson died of a heart attack President Eisenhower chose to nominate Earl Warren formerly the Governor of California on May 17th 1954 there were sighs some of the justices wives showed up some clerks were tipped off then reporters rushed the courtroom Warren starts off in a bland manner and you can't tell for a while as he's delivering the opinion what the outcome is going to be and then he comes to the key line and he says and we unanimously hold that separate but equal has no place in the Constitution and it was just electric in the courtroom when he said unanimous we conclude that in the field of public education the doctrine of separate but equal has no place separate educational facilities are inherently unequal therefore we Natalie hold that the plaintiffs are deprived vehicle protection laws guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment plus EB Ferguson in education is no more and in practice Plessy B Ferguson itself is no more the era of Jim Crow constitutionally speaking is over this was precisely what we urged them almost in that lunch so it was gratifying to have the opinion come down almost in the language of the argument that we made to in 1951 I'd used a plain geometry book that had been used by white student in 1935 Brown said that that was over the hand-me-down tubers that I played in the high school band from the White House schools it said to me that that was ended and it said to me that at some point I would not have to travel from Atlanta to Green Castle in Indiana to get a undergraduate degree that my family my cousin's my neighbors could go to Georgia Tech and to the University of Georgia the Supreme Court decision of 1954 was so made a Magna Carta it was the second Emancipation it was a great moment