Review of Strangers Chapter 1

Aug 22, 2024

Lecture Notes on Strangers Chapter 1 Review

Overview

  • Release Date: 2024
  • Genre: Horror
  • Key Point: Considered to be a poor addition to the horror genre, specifically in the franchise of "The Strangers."

General Impressions

  • Quality: Described as one of the worst horror films of the year.
  • Comparison: Noted as worse than other recent horror films like "Tarot."
  • Experience: Paying for a bad movie is compared to being robbed.

Franchise Context

  • Original Film: "The Strangers" (2008) is considered a classic.
  • Other Sequels: Second film from 2018 was forgettable, but this new chapter is criticized as the worst.
  • Filming of Trilogy: All three movies of this new trilogy have already been filmed and are set to be released over the next year.

Storyline Summary

  • Main Characters: A couple (unnamed) facing various challenges during their trip.
  • Setting: Stranded in Venus, Oregon, they stay at an Airbnb.
  • Plot Points:
    • Encountered car trouble.
    • Odd interactions with locals.
    • Creepy occurrences in the Airbnb.

Critiques of Characters and Plot

  • Character Development: Characters are described as dull and unlikable.
  • Dialogue: Characters have unconvincing and cringe-worthy dialogues.
  • Plot Issues:
    • Unnecessary plot element of proposal not leading to meaningful development.
    • Illogical decisions made by the characters throughout the film.

Specific Scenes

  • Use of Tropes: Heavy reliance on horror movie clichés.
  • Creepy Elements: Strange individuals knocking at the door, utilizing the song "Rockabye Baby."
  • Character Choices:
    • Propensity to call Airbnb owner at 1 AM for trivial issues.
    • Unnecessary humor that detracts from horror.
  • Climactic Moment:
    • A key scene involves a mistaken identity leading to shooting the wrong person (Joe, the Airbnb owner).
    • Fails logic tests as characters make poor survival choices.

Conclusion

  • Ending: Film concludes with a "to be continued" signal, leaving the audience curious but frustrated.
  • Overall Rating:
    • Critic suggests a very low rating of 15% on a fictional "moist meter."

Final Thoughts

  • Future of the Franchise: Despite the poor quality, curiosity remains about the upcoming sequels and how they will progress the story.