Coconote
AI notes
AI voice & video notes
Try for free
⚖️
Federalist 78: Judicial Independence and Powers
May 1, 2025
Federalist 78 Lecture Notes
Overview of Federalist Papers
Written to advocate for the ratification of the U.S. Constitution.
Federalist 78 focuses on the judicial branch as per Alexander Hamilton.
Context of Federalist 78
No federal court system under Articles of Confederation.
Need for a new judicial institution acknowledged.
Debates about judicial appointments and powers.
Appointment and Term of Federal Judges
Appointment:
Federal judges are appointed by the President (Article 3 of the Constitution).
Term:
Judges hold their offices "during good behavior," effectively a lifetime tenure.
Rationale for Lifetime Appointments
Independence:
Ensures the judicial branch operates independently, free from political pressure, in line with Madison's argument in Federalist 51.
Impartiality:
Judges can rule without concern for re-election.
Continuity and Expertise:
Maintains judicial expertise due to familiarity with precedents.
Practical Considerations:
Temporary judges would deter qualified candidates from leaving lucrative law practices for judicial positions.
Judicial Power and Judicial Review
Duty:
Federal judges must void acts contrary to the Constitution.
Judicial Review:
Responsible for ensuring laws passed by Congress are constitutional.
If a law is unconstitutional, it is considered null and void.
Debate on Judicial Power
Concerns:
Detractors feared judicial review might make the judiciary more powerful than the legislature.
Hamilton’s Rebuttal:
Judicial review doesn't make judiciary superior.
Courts act as a check between people and legislature.
The power of the people, as expressed in the Constitution, is superior to both the judiciary and legislature.
Summary
Lifetime appointments are crucial for judicial independence and effectiveness.
Judicial review checks legislative powers without overpowering it, ensures adherence to constitutional limits.
Understanding these points is key to Federalist 78’s argument for the judiciary's role in government balance.
📄
Full transcript