🧪

Milgram's Obedience Study Overview

Aug 27, 2025

Overview

This lecture explores obedience to authority, focusing on Stanley Milgram's experiments and their implications for understanding why ordinary people may commit harmful acts under orders.

Historical Context & Real-World Examples

  • Adolf Eichmann claimed in his trial that he was "just following orders" for his crimes during WWII.
  • Abu Ghraib prison abuse by US military personnel showed similar obedience, with individuals stating they were instructed to act.

Milgram's Obedience Experiment: Setup & Procedure

  • Conducted in the 1960s during Eichmann's trial to investigate obedience to authority.
  • 40 male participants (ages 20–50, varied backgrounds) were recruited through a newspaper ad.
  • Participants believed the study was about learning and punishment; roles were rigged so real participant was always the "teacher".
  • "Learner" was a confederate strapped to a fake electric chair; shocks ranged from 15 to 450 volts.
  • Teachers gave real (mild) shocks to believe the setup.
  • For every wrong answer, the teacher was instructed to increase the shock voltage.

Experiment Results & Findings

  • Yale students predicted only 1.2% would administer the maximum shock.
  • All participants obeyed up to 300 volts; 65% continued to 450 volts (maximum).
  • Participants often showed signs of severe stress: sweating, trembling, stuttering, etc.

Variations in Obedience Rates

  • Proximity:
    • Teacher and learner in same room: obedience dropped to 40%.
    • Teacher had to press learner's hand onto plate: obedience dropped to 30%.
    • Experimenter absent, instructions via phone: obedience dropped to 20.5%.
  • Location:
    • Yale setting (original): 65% obedience; office building: 48%.
  • Uniform:
    • Experimenter in lab coat: 65% obedience; ordinary clothes: 20%.

Ethical & Methodological Criticisms

  • Harm: Teachers experienced significant stress; possible lasting effects.
  • Deception: Participants were misled about the true purpose and reality of the shocks.
  • Ecological Validity: Lab setting may not reflect real-life situations.
  • Population Validity: Sample was only males who volunteered via newspaper ad—limits generalizability.

Key Terms & Definitions

  • Obedience — complying with orders from an authority figure.
  • Confederate — an actor secretly working for the experimenter.
  • Ecological Validity — the extent to which findings apply to real-world settings.
  • Population Validity — how well findings represent the broader population.
  • Deception (in research) — misleading participants about the true nature of a study.

Action Items / Next Steps

  • Review Milgram experiment variations and results.
  • Reflect on real-world implications of obedience.
  • Prepare any assigned readings or essays on ethical considerations in psychological research.