🌾

12. Battle for Land

Feb 3, 2025

Battle for Land: Fascist Agricultural Policies

Land Reclamation

  • Fascism's second major initiative focused on land reclamation and improvement.
  • Expansion of Previous Initiatives:
    • Previous governments initiated land drainage and irrigation.
    • Mussolini expanded these schemes.
  • The Pontine Marshes:
    • Located 50 km from Rome, easily accessible to foreign journalists.
    • Drained and transformed into a network of farms owned by ex-servicemen.
  • Success and Limitations:
    • Improved health and provided thousands of jobs during the depression.
    • However, the actual amount of land reclaimed was limited.

Impact of Agricultural Policy on Living Standards

  • Wage Cuts:
    • Agricultural workers faced more severe wage cuts than industrial workers in the 1930s.
  • Emigration and Urbanization:
    • Historically, emigration was a solution to rural poverty.
    • 200,000 Italians emigrated to the USA annually in the early 1900s.
    • 1920 US Immigration Policies:
      • The USA stopped most immigration, closing this option.
    • Resulting urban migration:
      • Half a million people left the countryside in the 1920s-1930s.
      • Rome's population doubled between 1921 and 1941.
  • Mussolini's Views and Policies:
    • Preferred rural lifestyle, aimed to ruralize Italy.
    • Desired to cultivate a prosperous peasant class loyal to Fascism.
    • Policies favored wealthy landowners over poor, landless peasants.
    • Dropped a law to break up estates for fear of alienating landowner supporters.
  • Consequences:
    • Economic underdevelopment and poverty persisted in the south.
    • The disparity between the industrial north and rural south widened.
    • Mussolini rarely visited poverty-stricken areas, such as Sicily, after 1924.
    • Italy ranked 18th in Europe for daily calorie intake, highlighting rural poverty in the south.

Conclusion

  • Mussolini's agricultural policies were double-edged:
    • Provided some improvements such as job creation and health benefits from land reclamation.
    • Yet, failed to address deeper issues like wage disparity, emigration, and southern poverty.
    • Ultimately benefited wealthy landowners more than the intended peasantry.