Rule 412 outlines the obligations of the State to disclose certain information to the defense counsel upon written motion.
Applies to matters within the State's possession or control unless otherwise restricted.
Key Provisions
(a) Required Disclosures
Witness Information
Names and last known addresses of witnesses the State intends to call.
Includes relevant statements and memoranda of oral statements.
Court examination of memoranda for substantial verbatim reports.
Statements by Accused or Codefendant
Written/recorded oral statements and witness lists related to these statements.
Grand Jury Minutes
Transcripts of relevant portions of the grand jury minutes.
Expert Reports
Reports or statements of experts, qualifications, and results of relevant exams or tests.
Documents and Objects
Any tangible evidence the prosecution intends to use or that was obtained from the accused.
Prior Convictions
Records of prior convictions for witness impeachment purposes.
(b) Electronic Surveillance
Obligation to inform defense of any surveillance of the accused or their premises.
(c) Exculpatory Evidence
Duty to disclose any material negating guilt or reducing punishment.
Requires good-faith effort to specifically identify such material.
(d) Timing of Disclosures
Obligations must be fulfilled as soon as practicable after a defense motion.
(e) Manner of Disclosure
Can be mutually agreed upon or involve inspection, testing, copying, and photographing.
(f) Information Flow
Ensures all relevant information is accessible between investigative personnel and the State.
(g) Third-Party Material
State must attempt to acquire relevant materials from other government entities upon defense request.
(h) Discretionary Disclosures
Court may require disclosure of other relevant materials if materiality and reasonableness are demonstrated.
(i) Denial of Disclosure
Court can deny disclosure if risks outweigh benefits (e.g., harm, intimidation, economic reprisals).
(j) Matters Not Subject to Disclosure
Work Product
Legal research or internal reports/opinions.
Informants
Identity protected unless constitutional rights are infringed.
National Security
Disclosure not required if it risks grave national security prejudice.
Additional Notes
Amendments and effective dates outlined, with adaptations depending on potential unfairness in ongoing proceedings.
Committee concerns and recommendations in ensuring disclosures do not conceal exculpatory or mitigating information.
Clarifications on the scope of disclosure and identification duties, aiming to avoid retroactive judgment based on defense theories revealed post-disclosure.
Committee Comments
Emphasizes the importance of pretrial disclosure to facilitate defense preparation and trial efficiency.
Specific identification of exculpatory information not seen as an admission or necessarily admissible.
Addresses the challenges and intentions behind broader disclosure obligations beyond the immediate possession of the State.