🧠

Understanding Resistance to Social Influence

May 12, 2025

Lecture Notes: Resistance to Social Influence

Overview

  • Discussion on why some individuals resist social pressure to conform or obey.
  • Reference to key studies: Ash's conformity study and Milgram's obedience experiment.
  • Introduction of the concept of social support and locus of control.

Key Studies

  • Ash's Study:
    • 25% of participants resisted conformity in critical trials.
    • Showed significant social pressure but maintained independence.
  • Milgram's Experiment:
    • 65% of participants continued to the highest shock level.
    • 35% resisted authority pressure to stop the experiment.

Explanations of Resistance

1. Social Support (Situational Explanation)

  • Individuals resist social influence more easily with the presence of social support.
  • Conformity:
    • A dissenting individual can break the group's unanimity, offering an alternative group.
  • Obedience:
    • Resisting authority becomes easier when others challenge the legitimacy of authority.
  • Studies Supporting Social Support:
    • Milgram's variation with confederate teachers lowered obedience rates from 65% to 10%.
    • Ash's unanimity variation dropped conformity from 32% to 5.5% with a dissenting ally.

2. Locus of Control (Dispositional Explanation)

  • Internal Locus of Control:
    • Belief in personal control over life events.
    • More likely to resist social pressure due to sense of personal responsibility.
  • External Locus of Control:
    • Life events attributed to external factors like luck or fate.
    • Less likely to resist due to lack of personal responsibility.
  • Research on Locus of Control:
    • Holland’s study: Internals more likely to resist, but still 63% gave high shocks.
    • Spectre’s research: External locus related to normative social influence, not informational.

Evaluations and Criticisms

  • Social support and locus of control are partial explanations.
  • Relationship between locus of control and resistance is correlational, not causal.
  • Other related factors:
    • Social anxiety
    • Personal morality
    • Social status

Resources for Further Learning

  • Mention of the Psyche Boost app and its features.
  • Encourage viewing additional materials and tutorials for deeper understanding.

Conclusion

  • Understanding resistance to social influence involves both situational and dispositional factors.
  • Continued research and exploration in this area can offer more comprehensive insights.

Acknowledgments

  • Thanks to Patreon supporters for enabling the creation of educational content.
  • Special thanks to specific supporters like azy Taylor for their contributions.