Psychology Research Methods: Intuition vs. Scientific Inquiry

Jul 28, 2024

Can Week-Old Pizza Cause Hallucinations? And Other Questions in Psychology

Introduction

  • **Common Questions: **
    • Can week-old pizza cause hallucinations?
    • Does coffee make you smarter?
  • Our intuitions about human behavior can be misleading, leading to false conclusions.
  • Importance of scientific inquiry to understand behaviors accurately.

Problems with Intuition

  • Hindsight Bias:
    • We tend to overestimate our ability to predict events after they have occurred.
    • Example: Believing we “knew it all along” after seeing outcomes.
  • Overconfidence Bias:
    • Overestimating the accuracy of our beliefs and predictions.
    • We feel confident but can often be wrong.
  • Perceiving Order in Random Events:
    • Seeing patterns where none exist, like interpreting a series of coin flips.

Methods in Psychological Research

Step 1: Operationalizing Questions

  • Transforming general questions into measurable and testable propositions.
  • Theory in sciences:
    • Organizes observations and predicts outcomes.
  • Hypothesis:
    • Testable prediction derived from a theory.
  • Importance of clear language to allow replication.

Case Studies

  • In-depth look at one individual.
  • **Pros: **
    • Highlights what can happen.
    • Good for storytelling and framing questions.
  • **Cons: **
    • Non-replicable.
    • Risk of over-generalizing.

Naturalistic Observation

  • Observing behavior in a natural setting without intervention.
  • **Pros: **
    • Describes behavior accurately.
  • **Cons: **
    • Limited in explaining behavior.

Surveys and Interviews

  • Collecting data by asking people about their opinions and behaviors.
  • Pros:
    • Effective for accessing attitudes and beliefs.
  • Cons:
    • Subtle wording can influence results.
    • Sampling bias can skew results.
  • Examples:
    • Alfred Kinsey’s survey on sexual behavior.

Correlations and Predictions

  • Identifying relationships between traits or behaviors.
  • **Correlation is not Causation: **
    • Correlations suggest possible cause-effect relationships but don’t prove them.

Experimental Research

  • Key to understanding cause-and-effect relationships.
  • Components:
    • Independent Variable: Manipulated factor (e.g., caffeine dosage).
    • Dependent Variable: Measured outcome (e.g., maze completion time).
    • Control Group: Not exposed to the independent variable.
  • Random Assignment:
    • Minimizes biases and confounding variables.
  • Double Blind Procedure:
    • Neither participants nor researchers know who belongs to which group.

Example Experiment: Caffeine and Problem-Solving

  • Question: Do humans solve problems faster with caffeine?
  • Hypothesis: Adult humans given caffeine navigate a maze faster than without caffeine.
  • Procedure:
    • Control group: Decaf
    • Experimental group one: 100mg caffeine
    • Experimental group two: 500mg caffeine
    • Measure maze completion time.
  • Outcome: Compare results to see correlation between caffeine and performance.

Conclusion

  • Scientific method is invaluable in psychological research.
  • Learnt Methods:
    • Applying scientific methods, case studies, naturalistic observations, surveys, and experiments.
  • Importance of avoiding biases in research.
  • Thanks to contributors and viewers for enabling educational content.