📚

Understanding Obedience in Social Psychology

Feb 19, 2025

Social Psychology Lecture: Obedience

Key Concepts

  • Obedience: Following instructions from an authority figure. Not the same as conformity, where decisions are made individually.
  • Conformity: Choosing to do what others are doing for personal reasons.

Stanley Milgram's Studies on Obedience

  • Purpose: Originally inspired by the Nuremberg trials post-World War II, where German soldiers claimed they were "just following orders."
  • Initial Hypothesis: Assumed Germans were more susceptible to following orders than Americans.
  • Findings: Surprisingly, American participants showed high levels of obedience, contrary to expectations.

The Milgram Experiment

  • Setup: Participants were assigned as "teachers," and confederates were "learners."
    • Authority Figure: Experimenter gave instructions, often dressed in a lab coat.
  • Procedure:
    • Learners had to memorize word pairs.
    • Incorrect answers resulted in electric shocks to learners.
    • Shocks increased in intensity from mild to potentially lethal (15 volts to 450 volts).
  • Purpose: To see if participants would obey authority to the point of inflicting harm.

Findings

  • High Obedience Rates: Most participants administered shocks despite learners' screams.
  • Experiment Variations:
    • Location, appearance of the experimenter, and presence of dissenting figures affected obedience.
    • Higher obedience at prestigious locations like Yale.
    • Lower obedience when the experimenter was not in the room or when wearing casual clothing.
  • Psychological Impact: Many participants experienced stress but continued due to authority pressure.

Ethical Considerations

  • Deception: Participants were misled about the true nature of the study.
  • Participant Distress: High levels of stress experienced during the experiment.
  • Debriefing: Participants were informed post-experiment, but not always fully.

Factors Influencing Obedience

  • Responsibility: When participants were told they weren't responsible, obedience increased.
  • Social Influence: Peer support led to lower obedience.
  • Proximity: Being closer to the victim reduced obedience.

Compliance Techniques

  • Norm of Reciprocity: Doing favors to elicit compliance.
  • Foot-in-the-Door: Small request followed by a larger one.
  • Door-in-the-Face: Large request followed by a smaller one.
  • Lowballing: Offering a low price to secure commitment, then increasing it.

Applications

  • Social Conditioning: Politeness and social norms can influence obedience.
  • Entrapment: Gradual commitments lead to increased compliance.
  • Real-World Implications: Historical and modern scenarios, from war crimes to corporate practices, illustrate these concepts.

Conclusion

  • Experiment Legacy: Milgram's study illustrates the power of authority and situational factors in influencing human behavior.
  • Contemporary Relevance: These principles are observed in various settings today, emphasizing the importance of awareness and critical thinking.