Coconote
AI notes
AI voice & video notes
Try for free
📚
Understanding Obedience in Social Psychology
Feb 19, 2025
Social Psychology Lecture: Obedience
Key Concepts
Obedience
: Following instructions from an authority figure. Not the same as conformity, where decisions are made individually.
Conformity
: Choosing to do what others are doing for personal reasons.
Stanley Milgram's Studies on Obedience
Purpose
: Originally inspired by the Nuremberg trials post-World War II, where German soldiers claimed they were "just following orders."
Initial Hypothesis
: Assumed Germans were more susceptible to following orders than Americans.
Findings
: Surprisingly, American participants showed high levels of obedience, contrary to expectations.
The Milgram Experiment
Setup
: Participants were assigned as "teachers," and confederates were "learners."
Authority Figure
: Experimenter gave instructions, often dressed in a lab coat.
Procedure
:
Learners had to memorize word pairs.
Incorrect answers resulted in electric shocks to learners.
Shocks increased in intensity from mild to potentially lethal (15 volts to 450 volts).
Purpose
: To see if participants would obey authority to the point of inflicting harm.
Findings
High Obedience Rates
: Most participants administered shocks despite learners' screams.
Experiment Variations
:
Location, appearance of the experimenter, and presence of dissenting figures affected obedience.
Higher obedience at prestigious locations like Yale.
Lower obedience when the experimenter was not in the room or when wearing casual clothing.
Psychological Impact
: Many participants experienced stress but continued due to authority pressure.
Ethical Considerations
Deception
: Participants were misled about the true nature of the study.
Participant Distress
: High levels of stress experienced during the experiment.
Debriefing
: Participants were informed post-experiment, but not always fully.
Factors Influencing Obedience
Responsibility
: When participants were told they weren't responsible, obedience increased.
Social Influence
: Peer support led to lower obedience.
Proximity
: Being closer to the victim reduced obedience.
Compliance Techniques
Norm of Reciprocity
: Doing favors to elicit compliance.
Foot-in-the-Door
: Small request followed by a larger one.
Door-in-the-Face
: Large request followed by a smaller one.
Lowballing
: Offering a low price to secure commitment, then increasing it.
Applications
Social Conditioning
: Politeness and social norms can influence obedience.
Entrapment
: Gradual commitments lead to increased compliance.
Real-World Implications
: Historical and modern scenarios, from war crimes to corporate practices, illustrate these concepts.
Conclusion
Experiment Legacy
: Milgram's study illustrates the power of authority and situational factors in influencing human behavior.
Contemporary Relevance
: These principles are observed in various settings today, emphasizing the importance of awareness and critical thinking.
📄
Full transcript