📜

Discussion on Biblical Inerrancy and Inspiration

Dec 23, 2024

Lecture on Biblical Inerrancy and Inspiration

Key Speakers

  • Kevin Van Hooser: Advocates that inerrancy applies to all affirmations made by scriptural authors.
  • Geisler: Holds a limited inerrancy view, which seems inconsistent with Van Hooser's approach.

Inerrancy

  • Definition: Inerrancy means scriptures are truthful in all affirmations, not just in doctrinal statements.
  • Van Hooser's View:
    • Asserts that the Bible is wholly true.
    • Inerrancy covers all aspects, including ethical instructions.
  • Geisler's View:
    • Limited inerrancy is seen as contradictory.
    • Believes in human elements in scripture.

Inspiration

  • Traditional Understanding:
    • No clear mechanism of inspiration provided by the Bible.
    • Debate over divine dictation vs. human authorship.
  • 2 Timothy 3:16: Often cited for inspiration but lacks clarity on divine dictation.
  • Chicago Statement:
    • Asserts that God caused writers to use specific words.
    • Contradictions noted between divine dictation and human freedom.

Geisler's Systematic Theology

  • Human Agency:
    • Acknowledges human personality and culture in biblical texts.
    • Bible is a human book without error.
  • Divine Concurrence:
    • God's words align with human authors' desires.
    • Tension between freedom and divine choice of words.

Critiques and Observations

  • Geisler's Perspective:
    • Appears to want both dictation and human element.
    • Contradicts his own anti-Calvinistic views.
  • Syllogism: "God cannot err, therefore the Bible cannot err" is seen as simplistic.

Traditional Inerrancy Views

  • Verbal Plenary: Every word is inspired, not just the message.
  • Discrepancies Noted:
    • Differences in grammar and memory lapses in scriptural texts.
    • Concerns about editorial fatigue and parable versions.

Conclusion

  • Understanding of Inspiration:
    • More into "Word of God" than may be intended.
    • Ambiguity in "theanustas" (God-breathed) interpretation.
  • Verses Used:
    • 2 Peter 1:20-21: Prophecy as spoken, not written.
    • Possible over-interpretation by traditional inerrantists.

These notes provide an overview of the discussion on scripture inerrancy and inspiration, highlighting contrasting views and complexities in understanding biblical texts.