Government can do anything not explicitly barred by the Constitution
Strict Construction: Jefferson’s view
Government only do what is explicitly allowed by the Constitution
Necessary and Proper Clause: Hamilton’s defense for implied powers
Regional Advantages:
Hamilton’s plan seen as favoring the North;
Southern states had largely paid off their debt
Political Dynamics
Madison and Jefferson: Worked together to oppose Hamilton’s plan
Madison: Opposed from the House
Jefferson: Raised concerns in cabinet meetings
Supreme Court’s Role: Expected to side with Hamilton due to Washington’s influence
Legacy and Long-Term Consequences
Hamilton's View on Debt:
Wanted a perpetual national debt as a prop for support of the wealthy
Believed it would ensure loyalty and economic stability
Opposition View: Future taxation without representation
Conclusion
Summary: Hamilton’s plan was a foundational yet controversial aspect of early US financial policy
Next Steps: Explore the ongoing fight over Hamilton's plan and additional historical content through a modern take (e.g., Hamilton musical's cabinet debate in spoken verse)