Lecture Notes: Case of James Bulger and its Aftermath

Introduction

• Discussion on one of the worst crimes in British history involving the murder of 2-year-old James Bulger in 1993.
• Murder committed by two 10-year-olds, Robert Thompson and Jon Venables.
• Recent charges against Jon Venables have reignited public anger.

Background

• James Bulger was lured to his death by Thompson and Venables.
• Both were released at 18 after serving 8 years in detention with new identities.

Recent Developments

• Jon Venables charged with downloading and distributing child pornography.
• Raises questions on the effectiveness of their rehabilitation.

Investigation Insights

• Detective Superintendent Albert Kirby highlights suppressed details of the case:
  • The murder's sexual nature was not publicly revealed.
  • Concerns over the adequacy of the rehabilitation process.

Public and Family Reactions

• Denise Fergus, James’s mother, believes the killers were not properly punished, perceiving their detention as a reward.
• Public, especially in Liverpool, deeply angered by perceived leniency.

Legal and Societal Implications

• Lawrence Lee, Venables' lawyer, argues the boys didn't intend to kill James, claiming it wasn't premeditated.
• Decision to prioritize rehabilitation over punishment faces scrutiny.
• Debate over whether special treatment and resources for the boys were justified.

Impact on Families

• Denise Fergus and family received no formal support apart from public sympathy.
• Impact on Denise’s personal life, including marital issues and concerns for her children’s safety.

Venables' Life Post-Release

• Reports of Venables returning to Liverpool, violating parole conditions.
• Venables portrayed as having a troubled lifestyle post-release.

Reevaluation of the Case

• Calls for revisiting the original case and sentences.
• Suggestions that both Venables and Thompson should be re-incarcerated if further crimes are proven.

Conclusion

• Ongoing debate about handling of the case, with significant public and emotional impact.
• The case remains a point of national contention and reflection.