📚

Paul Tillich's Systematic Theology Explained

Apr 20, 2025

Lecture on Paul Tillich's Systematic Theology

Overview of Tillich's Work

  • Main Work: "Systematic Theology" (3 Volumes)
    • Published between 1951 and 1963
    • Second volume published in 1957
    • Divided into five parts, each structured around a 'correlation'

Structure of Systematic Theology

  • Five Parts:
    • Reason and Revelation
    • Being and God
    • Existence and Christ
    • Life and Spirit
    • History and the Kingdom of God

Method of Correlation

  • Tillich's approach is distinct from traditional dogmatics
  • Correlation Defined: Method in terms of question and answer
    • Existential Questions: Address existential concerns like purpose, origin, and the meaning of life
    • Theological Answers:
      • Revelation as the answer to reason
      • God as the answer to being
      • Christ as the answer to existence
      • Spirit as the answer to life
      • Kingdom of God as the answer to history

Misinterpretations of Tillich's Method

  1. Conservative Misunderstanding:
    • Perceives theology as a way to close off existential questioning
  2. Existentialist Misunderstanding:
    • Believes answers are derived from existential questions
  • True intention: Interdependence between existential questions and theological answers

Tillich's Philosophy and Theology

  • Emphasizes the blending of philosophy and theology
  • Philosophy not just questioning, but also answering
  • Theology not just answering, but also questioning
  • Philosophy should lead to theology
  • Theologians should engage with philosophical questioning

Relevance and Reformulation

  • Relevance of Religion: Always relevant and should be continuously reformulated to engage with contemporary contexts

Key Concepts in Tillich's Theology

  • God as Being Itself:
    • God as the ultimate concern and the unconditioned
    • God is not a thing among things, but the ground of being

Conclusion

  • Tillich's systematic theology offers a dynamic approach where existential questions and theological answers are interdependent. His work encourages a continuous dialogue between philosophy and theology, maintaining religion’s relevance across different historical contexts.