The movie is criticized because a similar concept was already explored in a 2015 YouTube series featuring Thomas traveling around the world.
The YouTube series is considered more realistic and less nonsensical compared to the movie.
Canon vs. Non-Canon
The YouTube series wasn’t canon, making it bearable, unlike this movie which is considered part of the official storyline.
Misrepresentation of the Original Vision
The movie misrepresents the original vision of Reverend Wilbert Awdry, the creator of Thomas.
The interpretation of Thomas wanting to “see the world” was originally about exploring the island of Sodor, not literally traveling around the globe.
New Character and Writing Issues
A new character in the movie nearly runs over the show's representation of Reverend Awdry.
The reviewer questions the writing quality, especially attributing it to Andrew Brenner, who was known for better storytelling.
Visuals and Animation
The reviewer is visually oriented and heavily critiques the cartoony and unrealistic animation style of the movie.
They find it distracting and unfitting for the Thomas series.
Realism and Plot Holes
Numerous examples highlight the unrealistic elements: Ace’s driving laws violation, fish carried in open trucks, and Thomas pulling an implausible number of cars.
Race and Geography Issues
The unrealistic portrayal of a worldwide journey, including factual errors about transportation and logistics, is heavily criticized.
The journey across Africa, traveling from Senegal to Tanzania, is highlighted as particularly absurd.
Musical Elements and Educational Content
The reviewer isn’t fond of the musical aspects and educational inserts, finding them inconsistent with the realistic tone of the series.
Unaddressed Consequences
Thomas and the Fat Controller’s actions, such as abandoning their duties to travel, have no real-world consequences or believable logistics.
This is seen as a poor message for the children watching.
Viewer’s Frustrations and Conclusion
The reviewer expresses deep frustration with the movie's faults and inconsistency.
They believe the film sends a terrible message to children, showing that there are no punishments for irresponsible actions.
Mentions the broader issue of lower standards in children's entertainment and a call for better quality storytelling.