Conference moderated by Rob for ISNR on January 15th.
Presentation by Richard focusing on neurofeedback, particularly bipolar montage training.
Aim: To simplify neurofeedback concepts and address confusion in the community.
Background
Neurofeedback: A technique used to train brain activity.
Bipolar Montage Training: Previously underutilized in neurofeedback, gaining attention recently.
Historically used due to limitations of equipment from the 70s to the 90s.
In contrast with monopolar techniques, which became popular with the advent of QEEG and z-score training.
Key Concepts
Bipolar Montage: Not a method, but a setup of electrodes where two sites are compared.
Simplification of Equipment: New Mind amplifiers and software are designed to simplify the learning process for clinicians without electronics background.
Linked vs. Unlinked Ears: New Mind software links ears by default; must be unlinked for bipolar montage.
Technical Aspects
Amplifier and Software Setup:
Use one channel and set reference and ground.
Unlink ears in software for accuracy.
Training Protocols:
Typically involve inhibiting a wide range (e.g., 1-40 Hz) while enhancing a narrower band.
Adjustments based on client response; critical to monitor physiological feedback.
Historical Context
Evolution of Techniques:
Shift from traditional EEG to advanced techniques due to technological advancements.
Influence of pioneers like Sue Othmer and Seburn Fisher in shaping modern protocols.
Introduction of coherence training and later infraslow frequency training.
Recent Developments
Seburn Fisher's Protocols:
Focus on therapy combined with neurofeedback.
Utilizes a mix of traditional and innovative techniques.
Emphasizes clinician’s role in therapy over the neurofeedback itself.
Infraslow Frequency Training:
Application in trauma treatment with notable physiological effects.
New methods involve fewer side effects and improved outcomes.
Practical Application
Session Control:
Adjust frequencies to find optimal training points.
Importance of understanding amplifier dynamics and signal processing.
Workshops and Learning:
Participation in workshops recommended to fully grasp complex methodologies.
Continual learning and adaptation of protocols based on empirical evidence.
Conclusion
Complexity and Confusion:
Neurofeedback involves complex concepts that require technical understanding.
Simplified systems are available, but advanced methods can offer additional benefits.
Future Directions:
Ongoing discussions and clarifications in the field needed.
Encouragement for professionals to seek further training and education.
Next Steps
Further exploration of bipolar montage and its effects in upcoming sessions.
Emphasis on community engagement and feedback to refine understanding.