The Race for the Arctic: Geopolitics and Trade Routes

Jul 19, 2024

The Race for the Arctic: Geopolitics and Trade Routes

Overview

  • Focus on Arctic geopolitics and the competition for resources/trade routes.
  • Climate change increasing global awareness and influence in the Arctic.
  • Melting ice opening new maritime trade routes between Europe and East Asia.
  • Resources in the Arctic: oil, gas, rare earth metals.
  • Key players: US, Russia, China (declared near-Arctic state in 2018).
  • Despite warming, Northern Sea Route traffic remains limited.

The Arctic Circle

  • Boundary: 66° 33' North (Arctic Circle).
  • Defined by sun positions during solstices.
  • Latitude shifts due to Earth’s axial tilt (~15m/year).
  • Total area: 20 million sq km (40% land, 60% water).
  • Eight stakeholder countries: Iceland, Norway, Sweden, Finland, Russia, Canada, US, Denmark (via Greenland).
  • Major landholdings: Russia (52%), Canada (23%), Denmark (17%).

Climate Change and Ice Melting

  • Arctic warming 3-4 times faster than the global average.
  • Temperature increase since 1979: 5°F (2.8°C).
  • Seasonal ice now comprises up to 70% of Arctic Ocean ice cover.
  • Predicted loss of seasonal ice by 2040 or earlier.
  • Economic interests grow with accessibility.
  • Maritime transport of goods: 80% via sea (~$25 trillion).

Russia’s Strategic Position

  • Russia holds 50% of Arctic coastline.
  • Major opportunities in maritime transport and resource extraction.
  • Estimates in 2008: 13% of global undiscovered oil in the Arctic.
  • Russia, China investing in Arctic LNG and energy projects.

Challenges of the Northern Sea Route

  • Shallow coastal waters, inadequate infrastructure (lifeboats, equipment).
  • Harsh weather conditions and polar darkness impacts navigability.
  • Limited rescue capabilities.
  • Increased navigation difficulties despite ice melting.
  • Low predictability discourages usage despite shorter distance.

Geopolitical Tensions

  • Arctic Council’s activity suspended post-Ukraine invasion by Russia.
  • Most Arctic Council members are NATO members, excluding Russia.
  • Military presence and exercises by NATO in Arctic regions: Nordic Response 2024.
  • Russian resource allocation to Ukraine reduces Arctic defenses.

China’s Arctic Interests

  • Declared near-Arctic state in 2018, interested in raw materials and trade routes.
  • Promotes the Polar Silk Road (part of the Belt and Road Initiative).
  • Significant investments in Russian LNG projects.
  • Concerns over longer-term environmental impacts and logistics.

Commercial Viability and Future Outlook

  • Route remains under-developed and rarely used internationally.
  • Major deterrents: political tensions, lack of infrastructure, harsh environment.
  • China and Russia both preparing for future opportunities despite current challenges.
  • Potential future reshaping of the geopolitical and economic landscape.
  • Ongoing developments: R&D in polar tech, military investments.

Summary

  • Arctic region is central in global geopolitics due to valuable resources and strategic location.
  • Despite warming climate and potential trade routes, practical challenges and geopolitical tensions limit current utilization.
  • Future interest poised to grow amidst technological and political developments.