Overview
This discussion compares the FujiFilm XT5 and Nikon Zf cameras based on extensive personal use, especially in travel, documentary, and street photography. The speaker shares detailed insights on handling, performance, image quality, and practical experiences, highlighting strengths and weaknesses of both systems.
Camera Build Quality and Handling
- FujiFilm XT5 had initial quality issues such as a wobbling back screen and problematic dual dials leading to accidental mode switching.
- Nikon Zf is more robust and premium-feeling, though heavier and lacking a deep grip, which can be uncomfortable with large lenses.
- The FujiFilm grip and light weight are advantageous for all-day use.
- The manual dial layout attracted the speaker to both cameras, but Nikon's implementation can be limiting in auto ISO and partial stop settings.
Controls and Usability
- Nikon’s top dials lose functionality in auto and third-stop modes, whereas Fuji's are more intuitive and flexible.
- Fuji’s back screen is more practical for street photography; Nikon's articulating screen is less convenient for quick, low-angle shots.
- The lack of a joystick on the Nikon Zf is inconvenient, leading to more screen-based composition, which feels less precise.
Autofocus and Performance
- The Nikon Zf significantly outperforms FujiFilm XT5 in autofocus, especially tracking moving subjects and eye detection.
- Slower autofocus on Fuji XT5 was the main reason for switching brands after waiting for updates.
- Nikon Zf’s metering, including highlight-based metering, delivers more accurate exposures in varying conditions.
Battery and Weather Sealing
- Battery life is similar between both models.
- Both are weather sealed, but FujiFilm experienced viewfinder ghosting in wet conditions, reducing confidence.
Menu System and User Interface
- FujiFilm’s menu and button layout are more transparent and easier to navigate.
- Image rating on the FujiFilm is more convenient and efficient for post-shoot review.
Image Quality and Files
- FujiFilm’s JPEG colors and film simulations are preferred, but Nikon Zf’s RAW files offer more detail and require less editing.
- 24MP from Nikon is sufficient and results in smaller file sizes, which is better for older computers.
- Nikon Zf’s low-light image quality is superior, with clean files up to ISO 3200.
Lens Selection and Pairing
- FujiFilm system lenses are generally smaller and lighter, making them ideal for street photography.
- Nikon’s smaller primes (24mm, 40mm, 50mm, 85mm, 35mm f/1.8) are comfortable; larger zooms become unwieldy for extended use.
- The FujiFilm lens aperture ring is a usability advantage.
Final Thoughts and Recommendations
- FujiFilm is ideal for slower-paced, manual shooting, and produces great JPEGs and ergonomics.
- Nikon Zf is better for fast-paced, moment-driven photography due to reliable autofocus and superior low-light output.
- The speaker expresses high satisfaction with the Nikon Zf, despite minor complaints, and encourages both brands to continue improving.
Recommendations / Advice
- Choose FujiFilm for lightweight, intuitive operation, and enjoyable shooting experience, especially if JPEGs matter.
- Opt for Nikon Zf if fast autofocus, robust build, and RAW flexibility are priorities, particularly in challenging lighting.