Mouse Comparison: AJ199 vs. Damo Shark

Overview

• Both mice priced at $38.
• Same 3395 sensor.
• Both are wireless and claim 60 grams.
• Both use USB-C unlike the G Pro.

Packaging

• Damo Shark: Nicer packaging with thicker cardboard and foam, plus extra goodies.
• AJ199: Standard packaging.

Size and Battery

• Damo Shark: Larger size, 83-hour battery life.
• AJ199: Smaller, better suited for claw grip or smaller hands, 40-hour battery life.
• Preference for shape: AJ199 is preferred by the speaker despite the shorter battery life.

Grip and Shape

• AJ199: Better for claw grip/smaller hands, easy to lift off the mouse pad due to a ledge on the side.
• Damo Shark: Larger, may fall out of hand when lifted, but comes with grip tape for better handling.
• Damo Shark’s mouse buttons (Mouse 1 and 2) have more curvature.

Build Quality

• Both have great quality.
• Damo Shark: Slightly nicer feel because of the coating, but has an unbalanced, soft, and mushy back button.
• AJ199: Uses Huano switches rated for 80 million clicks.
• Damo Shark: Uses TTC switches rated for 60 million clicks.

Cable

• AJ199: Flexible, comfortable wire; easy to use in wired mode.
• Damo Shark: Braided, durable, but its memory makes it hard to use in wired mode.
• AJ199 includes a dongle extender.

Software

• Damo Shark: No software needed, settings adjustable directly on the mouse (DPI and polling rate buttons).
• AJ199: Reported acceleration issue that requires software to fix.

Additional Features

• Damo Shark: Supports Bluetooth, useful for Mac/laptops with few ports.
• AJ199: Does not support Bluetooth.

Conclusion

• Both are highly recommended; the choice depends on preference for size and grip style.

Link for Purchase

• AliExpress referral link provided in the original content.