🇮🇳

Operation Sindur: Countering Terrorism Insights

May 8, 2025

Plain Speak Podcast Notes - Operation Sindur

Introduction

  • Host: Shivani Gupta
  • Guest: Major Manik Jolly
  • Topic: India's operation against Pakistan-based terror camps following the Pelgam attack.

Operation Sindur

  • Name Significance:

    • Named after the tragic event that involved targeted killings of Hindu males in front of their families.
    • Represents not just a military operation, but a collective national response.
    • Emphasizes emotional resonance and unity among victims, government, and the army.
  • Military Naming Convention:

    • Military operations often have arbitrary names, but Sindur is meaningful and intentional.
    • Example: Previous operations often have odd names without apparent significance.

Press Conference Insights

  • Participants: Major Sophia Kureshi (Army) and Wing Commander Vomika Singh (Air Force), both representing minority religions in India, emphasized inclusivity.
  • Message to Pakistan:
    • Operation Sindur is a calculated, proportionate action.
    • Wing Commander Singh warned Pakistan against retaliation, stating it could escalate the situation.

Pakistan's Dilemma

  • Options for Pakistan:

    1. Close the chapter: Best option, but unlikely to happen.
    2. Retaliate: Could lead to further escalation and expose support for terror camps.
    3. Delay actions: Likely, but will still have to respond in some capacity.
  • International Pressure:

    • Pakistan might face criticism for inaction against terror groups, risking international isolation.
    • Past examples show Pakistan playing the victim card post-attack to shift blame.

State of Terrorism in Pakistan

  • Continuing Threat:

    • Terror camps are integral to Pakistan’s governance and control over public sentiment.
    • Ideological foundations of terrorism rooted in radical Islamic theology are difficult to eradicate.
  • India's Strategic Approach:

    • Kinetic actions alone won't solve terrorism; broader strategies needed including political and economic pressure.
    • Cutting off resources (like water through IWT) seen as more effective than military action alone.

Conclusion

  • Public Sentiment:

    • Mixed feelings among Indian public regarding military action; low appetite for war despite a desire for effective response against terrorism.
    • Need for long-term solutions beyond immediate military actions to address the root causes of terrorism.
  • Future Responses:

    • India likely to remain on high alert; expectation of further attacks from Pakistan to maintain internal control.
    • The political landscape in Pakistan complicates decision-making regarding retaliation.
  • Final Thoughts:

    • Operation Sindur is a significant step, but the fight against terrorism is ongoing.
    • Importance of continuous pressure on Pakistan and a balanced approach incorporating all forms of warfare.