Coconote
AI notes
AI voice & video notes
Try for free
đź’»
Lenovo's LOQ Budget Gaming Laptop Review (2024)
Jul 8, 2024
Lenovo's LOQ Budget Gaming Laptop Review (2024)
Introduction
Objective
: Compare new Lenovo LOQ 2024 models with Intel Arc graphics and Nvidia GeForce graphics.
Key Question
: Are the new models still the best budget gaming laptops?
Sponsored Segment
Sponsor
: Ugreen Nexode Pro 100W charger.
Features
:
Up to 100W from a single port.
Charges MacBook Pro 14 from 0 to 86% in 60 minutes.
Smaller than a 96W MacBook charger.
Can charge up to 3 devices at once (Type-A, two Type-C ports).
Ugreen Nexode Pro 160W charger can charge up to 4 devices.
Design and Build Quality
Material
: Grey plastic finish on lid and interior.
Build Quality
: Decent with minimal keyboard or lid flex.
Screen Wobble
: Noticeable wobble.
Hinges
: Solid, enabling the lid to go all the way back.
Portability
:
Slightly thinner than previous model.
Weight: 5.3lb (2.4kg); with charger, 6.6lb (3kg).
Hardware Specifications
Screen, Battery, SSD, and RAM
: Same on both models.
CPU and GPU
: Differences.
Cheaper: 12th gen CPU, Intel Arc graphics.
Expensive: 13th gen CPU, Nvidia graphics.
Customization
: Options up to 14th gen CPU, RTX 4050/4060.
Keyboard and Touchpad
Keyboard
:
4 zones of RGB backlighting; Cheaper white-only option.
All keys and secondary functions lit up.
Customizable RGB effects in Lenovo's Vantage control panel.
Typing
: Good tactile feedback.
Touchpad
: Plastic; not very smooth, sometimes gripping fingers.
Ports
Right Side
:
USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-C.
Camera disconnect switch.
3.5mm audio combo jack.
USB 3.2 Gen 1 Type-A.
Left Side
: No ports.
Back
:
Two USB 3.2 Gen 1 Type-A.
HDMI 2.1.
Gigabit Ethernet.
Power input.
Notice
: Type-C and HDMI directly connect to discrete graphics.
Internal Layout and Upgradeability
Inside Layout
: Same in both models.
Battery at the front.
Two DDR5 memory slots in the middle.
M.2 SSD slots on either side.
Wi-Fi 6 card under spare SSD slot.
Wi-Fi Speed
: Adequate; Comparable to last year's LOQ.
Upgradeability
: High, supporting double-sided SSDs.
Audio and Cooling
Speakers
: Average sound for gaming laptops; clear but not much bass.
Latencymon Results
: Not ideal on both laptops.
Fans and Vents
: Two fans with a heatpipe; better control airflow with foam inserts.
Battery Life
Battery Options
:
4-Cell 60Wh (both models).
Larger 80Wh available.
Battery Performance
:
Video playback: ~4 hours.
Gaming: Longer life on Nvidia (51% longer than Intel Arc).
Battery Drain Issue
: Noticed during thermal testing; can limit power/performance in BIOS.
Charging Options
: Type-C charging available; Battery drop protection in BIOS.
Thermal Performance
CPU & GPU Temps
: Relatively cool under stress.
Performance Modes
: Quiet, Balance, Performance, Custom.
Performance Comparison
: Higher CPU power in Arc; GPU performance higher in Nvidia.
Gaming Performance
Games Tested
: Cyberpunk 2077, Red Dead Redemption 2, Control.
Result
: Nvidia outperforms Arc significantly.
3DMark Results
: Consistently shows Nvidia's superior performance.
Screen
Display
: 15.6” 1080p 144Hz; Higher-tier 1440p 165Hz available.
Color Gamut
: Varies slightly; overall decent.
Brightness
: 300 nits.
Backlight Bleed
: Minor, not noticeable during normal use.
Response Time
: 14ms; Faster than other budget models but not excellent.
Miscellaneous
MUX Switch
: Both models have it; Nvidia has Advanced Optimus.
Webcam
: 1080p, no Windows Hello, with privacy shutter.
Linux Support
: Excellent.
Pricing and Availability
Expected Prices
:
Arc: From $749 USD.
Nvidia: From $799 USD.
Potential for good sales, based on previous year.
Advice
: Watch for 2023 versions for better value.
Conclusion
Pros
:
Great budget gaming laptop.
Visual improvements.
Good thermals and upgradeability.
Cons
:
Strange port positioning.
Battery drain during heavy use.
Intel Arc is not competitive compared to Nvidia.
Overall
: Nvidia version highly recommended over Intel Arc for a better gaming performance and overall value.
đź“„
Full transcript