đź’»

Lenovo's LOQ Budget Gaming Laptop Review (2024)

Jul 8, 2024

Lenovo's LOQ Budget Gaming Laptop Review (2024)

Introduction

  • Objective: Compare new Lenovo LOQ 2024 models with Intel Arc graphics and Nvidia GeForce graphics.
  • Key Question: Are the new models still the best budget gaming laptops?

Sponsored Segment

  • Sponsor: Ugreen Nexode Pro 100W charger.
  • Features:
    • Up to 100W from a single port.
    • Charges MacBook Pro 14 from 0 to 86% in 60 minutes.
    • Smaller than a 96W MacBook charger.
    • Can charge up to 3 devices at once (Type-A, two Type-C ports).
    • Ugreen Nexode Pro 160W charger can charge up to 4 devices.

Design and Build Quality

  • Material: Grey plastic finish on lid and interior.
  • Build Quality: Decent with minimal keyboard or lid flex.
  • Screen Wobble: Noticeable wobble.
  • Hinges: Solid, enabling the lid to go all the way back.
  • Portability:
    • Slightly thinner than previous model.
    • Weight: 5.3lb (2.4kg); with charger, 6.6lb (3kg).

Hardware Specifications

  • Screen, Battery, SSD, and RAM: Same on both models.
  • CPU and GPU: Differences.
    • Cheaper: 12th gen CPU, Intel Arc graphics.
    • Expensive: 13th gen CPU, Nvidia graphics.
  • Customization: Options up to 14th gen CPU, RTX 4050/4060.

Keyboard and Touchpad

  • Keyboard:
    • 4 zones of RGB backlighting; Cheaper white-only option.
    • All keys and secondary functions lit up.
    • Customizable RGB effects in Lenovo's Vantage control panel.
  • Typing: Good tactile feedback.
  • Touchpad: Plastic; not very smooth, sometimes gripping fingers.

Ports

  • Right Side:
    • USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-C.
    • Camera disconnect switch.
    • 3.5mm audio combo jack.
    • USB 3.2 Gen 1 Type-A.
  • Left Side: No ports.
  • Back:
    • Two USB 3.2 Gen 1 Type-A.
    • HDMI 2.1.
    • Gigabit Ethernet.
    • Power input.
  • Notice: Type-C and HDMI directly connect to discrete graphics.

Internal Layout and Upgradeability

  • Inside Layout: Same in both models.
    • Battery at the front.
    • Two DDR5 memory slots in the middle.
    • M.2 SSD slots on either side.
    • Wi-Fi 6 card under spare SSD slot.
  • Wi-Fi Speed: Adequate; Comparable to last year's LOQ.
  • Upgradeability: High, supporting double-sided SSDs.

Audio and Cooling

  • Speakers: Average sound for gaming laptops; clear but not much bass.
  • Latencymon Results: Not ideal on both laptops.
  • Fans and Vents: Two fans with a heatpipe; better control airflow with foam inserts.

Battery Life

  • Battery Options:
    • 4-Cell 60Wh (both models).
    • Larger 80Wh available.
  • Battery Performance:
    • Video playback: ~4 hours.
    • Gaming: Longer life on Nvidia (51% longer than Intel Arc).
  • Battery Drain Issue: Noticed during thermal testing; can limit power/performance in BIOS.
  • Charging Options: Type-C charging available; Battery drop protection in BIOS.

Thermal Performance

  • CPU & GPU Temps: Relatively cool under stress.
  • Performance Modes: Quiet, Balance, Performance, Custom.
  • Performance Comparison: Higher CPU power in Arc; GPU performance higher in Nvidia.

Gaming Performance

  • Games Tested: Cyberpunk 2077, Red Dead Redemption 2, Control.
  • Result: Nvidia outperforms Arc significantly.
  • 3DMark Results: Consistently shows Nvidia's superior performance.

Screen

  • Display: 15.6” 1080p 144Hz; Higher-tier 1440p 165Hz available.
  • Color Gamut: Varies slightly; overall decent.
  • Brightness: 300 nits.
  • Backlight Bleed: Minor, not noticeable during normal use.
  • Response Time: 14ms; Faster than other budget models but not excellent.

Miscellaneous

  • MUX Switch: Both models have it; Nvidia has Advanced Optimus.
  • Webcam: 1080p, no Windows Hello, with privacy shutter.
  • Linux Support: Excellent.

Pricing and Availability

  • Expected Prices:
    • Arc: From $749 USD.
    • Nvidia: From $799 USD.
    • Potential for good sales, based on previous year.
  • Advice: Watch for 2023 versions for better value.

Conclusion

  • Pros:
    • Great budget gaming laptop.
    • Visual improvements.
    • Good thermals and upgradeability.
  • Cons:
    • Strange port positioning.
    • Battery drain during heavy use.
    • Intel Arc is not competitive compared to Nvidia.
  • Overall: Nvidia version highly recommended over Intel Arc for a better gaming performance and overall value.