Coconote
AI notes
AI voice & video notes
Try for free
📝
Missouri Compromise and Corrupt Bargain
Jul 22, 2024
Missouri Compromise and Corrupt Bargain Lecture
Overview
Slavery changes by 1819
Missouri Compromise reveals sectional tensions
1820s democracy transformation and consequences
Jackson and Van Buren founding the Democratic Party
Supporters of Jackson and Van Buren
Era of Good Feeling
Single political party: Democratic Republicans
Factions within the party with conflicting ideas
Old Republicans
Limited federal government
More power to states (state's rights argument)
Support from southerners
Blame Panic of 1819 on Tariff of 1816
Favor free trade, fewer tariffs, and taxes
National Republicans
Support American system (U.S. Bank, tariffs, federal funding for internal improvements)
Blame Panic of 1819 on Europe
Support protective tariffs
Cotton and Slavery
Pre-1800: Rice and long-staple cotton limited to coast
Upland/short-staple cotton can be grown inland but hard to process
Eli Whitney’s cotton gin (1794) revolutionized short-staple cotton processing
Cotton gin made short-staple cotton production boom
Cotton suited for slave labor due to year-round tending
Plantation System
Requires 20 or more enslaved people
Planters (non-working landowners) vs. yeoman farmers (self-working landowners)
Spread from South Carolina and Georgia to the Old Southwest (Alabama, Mississippi) and further west
Represents leading economic institution in the lower south
Planters controlled significant portion of enslaved population despite their small numbers
Expansion stifled town and industry growth but was highly profitable
Economic Impact
South's economy relied heavily on cotton
U.S. supplied significant raw cotton to England and France
Continuous increase in cotton demand and steady prices
Political Differences
Expansion of slavery created political differences between South and West vs. Mid-Atlantic and New England
Interactive radial cartography showing spread of slavery westward
Missouri Compromise
Context
Missouri part of Louisiana Purchase, originally assumed inhospitable for slavery
Slaveholders gained political power in Missouri, sought admission as slave state
Increased northern resentment over slavery and political power balance
Key Issues
Missouri forced Congress to discuss federal government’s power over territorial slavery
Tensions over balance between free and slave states in Senate
James Tallmadge amendment (1819) aimed to ban slavery in Missouri
Sectional voting lines led to a stalemate in Congress
Arguments
Northern argument: Congress has right to restrict slavery before statehood
Southern argument: Right to choose slavery, equality among states at risk
Concerns over future of slavery and white privilege
Talk of secession if Missouri wasn't admitted as slave state
Outcome
Continued stalemate, leading to the Missouri Crisis
Prelude to the American Civil War
Next Steps
Study further on the Missouri Crisis and how it almost led to civil war
đź“„
Full transcript