Study IQ Judiciary Legal Updates
Introduction
- Speaker: Apoorva Purohit
- Platform: Study IQ Judiciary
- Daily session time: 9:00 AM (yesterday's session was at 9:30 AM)
Important Legal Points of the Day
-
Fewer Posts for Women in JAG
- Supreme Court's question: Why fewer vacancies for women in the army?
- Case: Arshnoor Kaur versus Union of India
- Bench of Justice Dipankar Datta and Justice Manmohan
- Fewer vacancies for women, while more for men
- Mention of Section 12 of the Army Act
- Violation of Article 14?
-
Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA)
- Kushal Kumar Agarwal versus Directorate of Enforcement
- Main issue: Is it mandatory to hear the accused before taking cognizance?
- Section 223 of the Indian Code of Criminal Procedure
- Strictness of PMLA law
-
New Executive Chairman of NALSA
- Nomination of Justice Suryakant by the President
- Role of NALSA: Free legal aid
- Work under the Legal Services Authorities Act
-
Vandalization of Dr. Ambedkar's Statue
- Cognizance of Madhya Pradesh High Court
- PIL filed
- Incident occurred on Ambedkar Jayanti
Important Facts
- Eligibility for JAG exam: LLB with 55% marks, registration with Bar Council
- Role of NALSA: Free legal aid for marginalized and economically weaker sections
- Role of Enforcement Directorate under PMLA
- Indian Code of Criminal Procedure effective from July 1, 2024
Practice Questions
- What was the main argument of the petition in the Arshnoor Kaur case?
- Who holds the right of appointment under Section 12 of the Army Act for women?
- Who is the new Executive Chairman of NALSA?
- Which section of the Indian Code of Criminal Procedure mandates a hearing before cognizance?
These notes include all the important points from today's session, allowing you to easily review these topics in the future.