🍼

Sleeping Baby Shark Tank Summary

Aug 22, 2025

Summary

  • The meeting reviewed the Shark Tank pitch by Brett and Stephanie Parker for their company, Sleeping Baby, which sells the "Zippity Zip" swaddle transition product.
  • Key discussion points included the business’s organic growth, strong community engagement, and the critical nature of sleep solutions for new parents.
  • The Sharks debated the merits of scaling, retail expansion, and the valuation, resulting in several investment offers. The Parkers ultimately accepted Damon's offer of $200,000 for 20% equity; however, follow-up research indicated the deal was not finalized post-show.
  • The meeting also included an assessment of Sleeping Baby's current online presence and marketplace engagement.

Action Items

  • No outstanding time-bound action items were assigned during this meeting.

Sleeping Baby: Product and Business Model Overview

  • Brett and Stephanie Parker pitched Sleeping Baby, seeking $200,000 for 10% equity.
  • The Zippity Zip provides a womb-like but safe sleeping environment for babies transitioning out of swaddles.
  • The Parkers’ daughter inspired the invention due to sleep challenges; the product was initially sewn and launched by Stephanie at home.
  • Sales to date: 25,000 units, over $1 million in revenue within 2.5 years, with all sales direct-to-consumer via their website.
  • No outside marketing was conducted; growth was driven by word-of-mouth in online parenting communities.
  • The couple invested only $700 to start the business.
  • Pricing: $34.95–$39.95 per unit.
  • The business is supported by an active, supportive online community.

Entrepreneur and Shark Discussion Points

  • Sharks asked about the capacity to scale production, retail strategy, and patent protection.
  • Brett and Stephanie used community feedback to select product prints but acknowledged the difference between positive feedback and actual sales conversion.
  • Retail expansion was discussed, with concerns raised about risk, returns, inventory management, and loss of profit margins versus direct sales.
  • The product faces potential risks from lack of patent protection and possible competition from larger textile companies.
  • Sharks praised the founders’ community-driven approach and resilience through adversity, including the loss of a child.

Investment Negotiation

  • Lori offered $200,000 for 25%, intending to support retail expansion.
  • Kevin matched with $200,000 for 20%, warning of dangers in retail and suggesting the value in maintaining the direct-to-consumer model.
  • Another Shark also offered $200,000 for 20%, agreeing to cautiously test retail.
  • Brett and Stephanie countered with $200,000 for 15%, citing the value of their community and business foundation.
  • Damon, who specializes in apparel and manufacturing, held firm at 20%. The Parkers accepted his offer without partnering with another Shark.

Business Performance and Online Presence (Post-Pitch Review)

  • Website features clear product options by age, including sizes up to five years old, and broad print offerings.
  • Pricing aligns with initial pitch, with bundles available.
  • The product line includes accessories such as teethers.
  • Active social media presence: 127,000 Facebook likes, 35,000 Instagram followers. Engagement is higher on Instagram than Facebook.
  • No evidence found of a company-hosted private Facebook group despite strong community narrative.
  • Public updates indicate the deal with Damon was not finalized after the show, but the business remains operational.

Decisions

  • Accepted $200,000 investment for 20% equity from Damon — chosen for his manufacturing expertise and alignment with the founders’ direct-to-consumer vision; the proposed partnership was deemed the best fit among multiple offers.

Open Questions / Follow-Ups

  • Did Sleeping Baby ever revisit retail strategy or patent protection after the Shark Tank experience?
  • Is the creation of a private community group under consideration to boost engagement further?
  • Would the founders be open to a follow-up interview regarding updated business performance and lessons learned?