Insights on D&C 124:28 and the Fullness of Priesthood
Jul 12, 2024
Insights on D&C 124:28 and the Fullness of Priesthood
Context and Initial Thoughts
Presenter was interviewed about Doctrine and Covenants (D&C) 124:28.
Started an in-depth exploration into the history and context of the verse.
Verse: "For there is not a place found on the earth that he may come and restore again that which was lost unto you, or which he hath taken away, even the fullness of the priesthood."
Focus: understanding the "fullness of the priesthood" and its implications.
Key Verse Analysis
Restore Again: Indicates it was restored once before and lost again.
Fullness of the Priesthood: What was taken away that needs restoration?
Commandment to Build the Temple: Specific time given for establishment.
Promises and Conditions: Restoration tied to completion of the Nauvoo Temple.
Historical Context
Late 1830s: Multiple challenges within the Church, including apostasy and internal conflict.
1841: Command to build the Nauvoo Temple under the leadership of Joseph Smith.
1831 Isaac Morley Farm Conference: Significant in the history of the restoration of the Melchizedek Priesthood.
Fullness of the Priesthood
High Priesthood/Melchizedek Priesthood:
Requires a calling from God, not from men (Hebrews 5, JST Genesis 14).
Evidenced by manifestations of power (e.g., miracles akin to Nephi and Melchizedek).
Biblical examples: Christ received it through divine calling.
Historical Accounts: Notably from Levi Hancock, John Corrill, and Parley P. Pratt detailing spiritual manifestations and conferment of priesthood power.
Issues and Clarifications
Restoration in 1831 vs. 1829:
Some believe authority was first restored in 1829 by Peter, James, and John.
Contested by multiple accounts suggesting 1831 event was significant.
High Priests and Apostles: Differing accounts on the need for ordination.
Brigham Young’s Address (1853): Claimed apostles had fullness without being ordained high priests, raising questions about discrepancies.
Condemnation and Fullness
D&C 84 (1832): Church came under condemnation, which continued unresolved (according to Pres. Benson in the 1980s).
Impact on Fullness: Whether the church could claim fullness while under condemnation.
Reflections and Questions
Impact of Condemnation: If still under condemnation, can fullness of priesthood coexist?
Unanswered Questions:
Was the Nauvoo Temple completed in time and filled with power as prophesied?
Why are significant events like the Isaac Morley Farm not widely communicated in official histories?
Personal Reflection: The presenter’s own status as a high priest conflicts with findings, and they welcome further insight and correction.
Conclusion
Ongoing Inquiry: Encourages open dialogue and further research for clarity.
Call for Repentance: Reflection on the need for genuine repentance and spiritual rebirth.
Future Hope: Aspires for the true restoration of the Melchizedek Priesthood in its fullness.